The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Situ Observation of Rapid Ligand Exchange in Colloidal Nanocrystal Suspensions Using Transfer NOE Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Abstract
Recently, solution NMR-based approaches have been developed that represent useful new tools for the in situ characterization of the capping ligand in colloidal nanocrystal dispersions. So far, this development has focused mainly on tightly bound ligands (no exchange) or ligands in slow exchange with the nanocrystal surface. In such systems, the ligand can be identified and its amount and interaction quantified via 1D (1)H NMR, (1)H-(13)C HSQC, and DOSY spectra. Here, we explore the case where capping ligands are in fast exchange with the nanocrystal surface. Using dodecylamine-stabilized CdTe (Q-CdTe|DDA) and octylamine-stabilized ZnO (Q-ZnO|OctA) nanoparticles, we first show that the NMR methods developed so far fail to evidence the bound ligand when the effect of the latter on the exchange-averaged parameters is marginalized by an excess of free ligand. Next, transfer NOE spectroscopy, a well-established technique in biomolecular NMR, is introduced to demonstrate and characterize the interaction of a ligand with the nanocrystal surface. Using Q-PbSe nanocrystals capped with oleic acids as a reference system, we show that bound and free ligands have strongly different NOE spectra wherein only bound ligands develop strong and negative NOEs. For the Q-CdTe|DDA system, transfer NOE spectra show a similar rapid appearance of strong, negative NOEs, thereby unambiguously demonstrating that DDA molecules spend time at the nanocrystal surface. In the case of Q-ZnO|OctA, where a more complex mixture is analyzed, transfer NOE spectroscopy allows distinguishing capping from noncapping molecules, thereby demonstrating the screening potential offered by this technique for colloidal quantum dot dispersions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colloidal nanocrystal synthesis and the organic–inorganic interface
Yin, Y., & Alivisatos, A. P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04165 · Cited by 3,273
Cited by
The surface science of nanocrystals
Boles, M. A., Ling, D., Hyeon, T., & Talapin, D. V. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4526 · Cited by 1,742
Synthesis and properties of colloidal heteronanocrystals
Donegá, C. D. M. (2011) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c0cs00055h · Cited by 719
Nenon, D. P., Pressler, K., Kang, J., Koscher, B. A., Olshansky, J. H., Osowiecki, W. T., Koc, M. A., Wang, L.-W., & Alivisatos, A. P. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b11035 · Cited by 631
Size-Tunable, Bright, and Stable PbS Quantum Dots: A Surface Chemistry Study
Moreels, I., Justo, Y., De Geyter, B., Haustraete, K., Martins, J. C., & Hens, Z. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn103050w · Cited by 578
Self-citationUtilizing Self-Exchange To Address the Binding of Carboxylic Acid Ligands to CdSe Quantum Dots
Fritzinger, B., Capek, R. K., Lambert, K., Martins, J. C., & Hens, Z. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja104351q · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fritzinger, B., Moreels, I., Lommens, P., Koole, R., Hens, Z., & Martins, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-02-06
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3024-3032
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2018778172
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.