The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of Pore Size and Functionality in Isoreticular Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks and their Carbon Dioxide Selective Capture Properties
Abstract
Five new crystalline zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), ZIF-78 to -82, were prepared from zinc(II) nitrate and mixtures of 2-nitroimidazole and five different functionalized imidazoles and were found to have the GME topology. These structures, along with three previously reported GME ZIFs, constitute a series of highly porous materials with Brunauer-Emmet-Teller surface areas ranging from 620 to 1730 m(2)/g. The pore diameters and apertures vary incrementally from 7.1 to 15.9 A and 3.8 to 13.1 A, respectively, and the functionalities decorating the pores vary from polar cyano- and nitro- groups to nonpolar alkyl groups. The variability expressed in these materials makes them highly attractive for study as gas-separation media. Selectivity values calculated for separation of CO(2) and CH(4) predict that the ZIFs with polar functionality, ZIF-78 (10.6:1) and -82 (9.6:1), retain CO(2) gas to a greater degree than the other members of the GME series and BPL-activated carbon. These predictions are borne out in dynamic breakthrough studies, which confirm the increased capacity of ZIF-78 and -82 and demonstrate the promise of this class of materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases
Britt, D., Tranchemontagne, D., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804900105 · Cited by 958
Self-citation
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption
Yu, C.-H., Huang, C.-H., & Tan, C.-S. (2012) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132 · Cited by 1,730
Development and Evaluation of Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Separation and Capture
Bae, Y., & Snurr, R. Q. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201101891 · Cited by 1,208
Cravillon, J., Nayuk, R., Springer, S., Feldhoff, A., Huber, K., & Wiebcke, M. (2011) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm103571y · Cited by 916
Natural gas origin, composition, and processing: A review
Faramawy, S., Zaki, T., & Sakr, A. A.-E. (2016) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.030 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Banerjee, R., Furukawa, H., Britt, D., Knobler, C., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-03-02
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3875-3877
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2038440906
- Cited by
- 1,443
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 59.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.