The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postsynthetic Modification Switches an Achiral Framework to Catalytically Active Homochiral Metal−Organic Porous Materials
Abstract
The postsynthetic modification strategy is adopted to demonstrate for the first time the syntheses of catalytically active chiral MOPMs from a preassambled achiral framework, MIL-101, by attaching L-proline-derived chiral catalytic units to the open metal coordination sites of the host framework. Various characterization techniques (including PXRD, TGA, IR, and N(2) absorption measurements) indicated that the chiral units are successfully incorporated into MIL-101, keeping the parent framework intact. The new chiral MOPMs show remarkable catalytic activities in asymmetric aldol reactions (yield up to 90% and ee up to 80%). It is interesting to note that these heterogeneous catalysts show much higher enantioselectivity than the corresponding chiral catalytic units as homogeneous catalysts. This study demonstrates a simple and efficient route for the generation of catalytically active chiral MOPMs. A variety of chiral catalytic units can be, in principle, incorporated into chemically robust achiral MOPMs with large pores by postmodification and the resulting chiral MOPMs may find useful applications in catalytic asymmetric transformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Stable, crystalline, porous, covalent organic frameworks as a platform for chiral organocatalysts
Xu, H., Gao, J., & Jiang, D. (2015) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2352 · Cited by 1,643
Kökçam-Demir, Ü., Goldman, A., Esrafili, L., Gharib, M., Morsali, A., Weingart, O., & Janiak, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00609e · Cited by 895
Liu, Y., Xuan, W., & Cui, Y. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201000197 · Cited by 872
Pore Chemistry of Metal–Organic Frameworks
Ji, Z., Wang, H., Canossa, S., Wuttke, S., & Yaghi, O. M. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202000238 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Banerjee, M., Das, S., Yoon, M., Choi, H. J., Hyun, M. H., Park, S. M., Seo, G., & Kim, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-05-12
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7524-7525
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2078490530
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.