The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polar or Nonpolar? A+ Cation Polarity Control in A2Ti(IO3)6(A = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Tl)
Abstract
We have synthesized a series of new alkali-metal or Tl(+) titanium iodates, A(2)Ti(IO(3))(6) (A = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Tl). Interestingly the Li and Na phases are noncentrosymmetric (NCS) and polar, whereas the K, Rb, Cs, and Tl analogues are centrosymmetric (CS) and nonpolar. We are able to explain the change from NCS polar to CS nonpolar using cation-size arguments, coordination requirements, and bond valence concepts. The six materials are topologically similar, consisting of TiO(6) octahedra, each of which is bonded to six IO(3) polyhedra. These polyhedral groups are separated by the A(+) cations. Our calculations on Na(2)Ti(IO(3))(6) indicate that polarization reversal is energetically very unfavorable, rendering the material polar but not ferroelectric. For all of the materials, synthesis, structural characterization, electronic structure analysis, infrared spectra, UV-vis and thermogravimetric measurements, and ion-exchange reactions are reported. For the polar materials, second-harmonic generation, piezoelectricity, and polarization measurements were performed. Crystal data: Li(2)Ti(IO(3))(6): hexagonal, space group P6(3) (No. 173), a = b = 9.3834(11) A, c = 5.1183(6) A, Z = 1. Na(2)Ti(IO(3))(6): hexagonal, space group P6(3) (No. 173), a = b = 9.649(3) A, c = 5.198(3) A, Z = 1. K(2)Ti(IO(3))(6): trigonal, space group R3 (No. 148), a = b = 11.2703(6) A, c = 11.3514(11) A, Z = 3. Rb(2)Ti(IO(3))(6): trigonal, space group R3 (No. 148), a = b = 11.3757(16) A, c = 11.426(3) A, Z = 3. Cs(2)Ti(IO(3))(6): trigonal, space group R3 (No. 148), a = b = 11.6726(5) A, c = 11.6399(10) A, Z = 3. Tl(2)Ti(IO(3))(6): trigonal, space group R3 (No. 148), a = b = 11.4167(6) A, c = 11.3953(11) A, Z = 3.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Cited by
Ok, K. M. (2016) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00452 · Cited by 601
Self-citationMetal–organic frameworks as competitive materials for non-linear optics
Mingabudinova, L. R., Vinogradov, V. V., Milichko, V. A., Hey-Hawkins, E., & Vinogradov, A. V. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00395h · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, H.-Y., Kim, S.-H., Ok, K. M., & Halasyamani, P. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-04-22
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 6865-6873
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1989028490
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polar or Nonpolar? A+ Cation Polarity Control in A2Ti(IO3)6(A = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Tl). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja9015099
- The paper
- Chang, H.-Y., Kim, S.-H., Ok, K. M., & Halasyamani, P. S. (2009). Polar or Nonpolar? A+ Cation Polarity Control in A2Ti(IO3)6(A = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Tl). Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9015099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.