The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanism of Ethanol Synthesis from Syngas on Rh(111)
Abstract
Rh-based catalysts display unique efficiency and selectivity in catalyzing ethanol synthesis from syngas (2CO + 4H(2) --> C(2)H(5)OH + H(2)O). Understanding the reaction mechanism at the molecular level is the key to rational design of better catalysts for ethanol synthesis, which is one of major challenges for ethanol application in energy. In this work, extensive calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) were carried out to investigate the complex ethanol synthesis on Rh(111). Our results show that ethanol synthesis on Rh(111) starts with formyl formation from CO hydrogenation, followed by subsequent hydrogenation reactions and CO insertion. Three major products are involved in this process: methane, methanol, and ethanol, where the ethanol productivity is low and Rh(111) is highly selective to methane rather than ethanol or methanol. The rate-limiting step of the overall conversion is the hydrogenation of CO to formyl species, while the selectivity to ethanol is controlled by methane formation and C-C bond formation between methyl species and CO. The strong Rh-CO interaction impedes the CO hydrogenation and therefore slows down the overall reaction; however, its high affinity to methyl, oxygen, and acetyl species indeed helps the C-O bond breaking of methoxy species and therefore the direct ethanol synthesis via CO insertion. Our results show that to achieve high productivity and selectivity for ethanol, Rh has to get help from the promoters, which should be able to suppress methane formation and/or boost C-C bond formation. The present study provides the basis to understand and develop novel Rh-based catalysts for ethanol synthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Cited by
He, Z., Qian, Q., Ma, J., Meng, Q., Zhou, H., Song, J., Liu, Z., & Han, B. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201507585 · Cited by 313
Theoretical Study of Methanol Synthesis from CO2Hydrogenation on Metal-Doped Cu(111) Surfaces
Yang, Y., White, M. G., & Liu, P. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp208448c · Cited by 308
Self-citationIntrinsic Selectivity and Structure Sensitivity of Rhodium Catalysts for C2+ Oxygenate Production
Yang, N., Medford, A. J., Liu, X., Studt, F., Bligaard, T., Bent, S. F., & Nørskov, J. K. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b12087 · Cited by 230
Li, S., Feng, L., Wang, H., Lin, Y., Sun, Z., Xu, L., Xu, Y., Liu, X., Li, W.-X., Wei, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-024-01824-w · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, Y., & Liu, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-08-24
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 13054-13061
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1991377026
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.