The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrogen Storage in High Surface Area Carbons: Experimental Demonstration of the Effects of Nitrogen Doping
Abstract
The influence of nitrogen doping on the hydrogen uptake and storage capacity of high surface area carbon materials is presented in this report. To generate suitable study materials, we have exploited the relationship between synthesis conditions and textural properties of zeolite-templated carbons to generate a range of high surface area carbons with similar pore size distribution but which are either N-doped or N-free. For N-doped carbons, the nitrogen content was kept within a narrow range of between 4.7 and 7.7 wt %. The carbon materials, irrespective of whether they were doped or not, exhibited high surface area (1900-3700 m(2)/g) and pore volume (0.99 and 1.88 cm(3)/g), a micropore surface area of 1500-2800 m(2)/g, and a micropore volume of 0.65-1.24 cm(3)/g. The hydrogen uptake varied between 4.1 and 6.9 wt %. We present experimental data that indicates that the effect of N-doping on hydrogen uptake is only apparent when related to the surface area and pore volume associated with micropores rather than total porosity. Furthermore, by considering the isosteric heat of hydrogen adsorption and excess hydrogen uptake on N-free or N-doped carbons, it is shown that N-doping can be beneficial at lower coverage (low hydrogen uptake) but is detrimental at higher coverage (higher hydrogen uptake). The findings are consistent with previous theoretical predictions on the effect of N-doping of carbon on hydrogen uptake. The findings, therefore, add new insights that are useful for the development of carbon materials with enhanced hydrogen storage capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The preparation of active carbons from coal by chemical and physical activation
Ahmadpour, A., & Do, D. D. (1996) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/0008-6223(95)00204-9 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Energy storage applications of activated carbons: supercapacitors and hydrogen storage
Sevilla, M., & Mokaya, R. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43525c · Cited by 1,614
Self-citationWen, Z., Wang, X., Mao, S., Bo, Z., Kim, H., Cui, S., Lu, G., Feng, X., & Chen, J. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201201920 · Cited by 939
Templated nanocarbons for energy storage
Nishihara, H., & Kyotani, T. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201201715 · Cited by 745
Zhang, L., Zhang, F., Yang, X., Long, G., Wu, Y., Zhang, T., Leng, K., Huang, Y., Ma, Y., Yu, A., et al. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01408 · Cited by 721
Nitrogen-containing porous carbons: synthesis and application
Shen, W., & Fan, W. (2013) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c2ta00028h · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, Y., Walker, G. S., Grant, D. M., & Mokaya, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-10-23
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 16493-16499
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2069649867
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.