The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virtual High Throughput Screening Confirmed Experimentally: Porous Coordination Polymer Hydration
Abstract
Hydrothermal stability is a pertinent issue to address for many industrial applications where percent levels of water can be present at temperatures ranging from subambient to several hundred degrees. Our objective is to understand relative stabilities of MOF materials through experimental testing combined with molecular modeling. This will enable the ultimate design of materials with improved hydrothermal stability, while maintaining the properties of interest. The tools that we have employed for these studies include quantum mechanical calculations based upon cluster models and combinatorial steaming methods whereby a steam stability map was formulated according to the relative stability of different materials. The experimental steaming method allows for high throughput screening of materials stability over a broad range of steam levels as well as in-depth investigation of structural transformations under more highly resolved conditions, while the cluster model presented here yields the correct trends in hydrothermal stability. Good agreement was observed between predicted relative stabilities of materials by molecular modeling and experimental results. Fundamental information from these studies has provided insight into how metal composition and coordination, chemical functionality of organic linker, framework dimensionality, and interpenetration affect the relative stabilities of PCP materials. This work suggests that the strength of the bond between the metal oxide cluster and the bridging linker is important in determining the hydrothermal stability of the PCP. Although the flexibility of the framework plays a role, it is not as important as the metal-linker bond strength. This demonstration of alignment between experimental and calculated observations has proven the validity of the method, and the insight derived herein insight facilitates direction in designing ideal MOF materials with improved hydrothermal stability for desired applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Cited by
BioMOFs: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Biological and Medical Applications
McKinlay, A. C., Morris, R. E., Horcajada, P., Férey, G., Gref, R., Couvreur, P., & Serre, C. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201000048 · Cited by 1,256
Tan, J. C., & Cheetham, A. K. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00163e · Cited by 762
Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 as efficient pH-sensitive drug delivery vehicle
Sun, C.-Y., Qin, C., Wang, X.-L., Yang, G.-S., Shao, K.-Z., Lan, Y.-Q., Su, Z.-M., Huang, P., Wang, C.-G., & Wang, E.-B. (2012) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c2dt30357d · Cited by 710
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Food Safety
Wang, P.-L., Xie, L.-H., Joseph, E. A., Li, J.-R., Su, X.-O., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257 · Cited by 533
Coudert, F.-X. (2015) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00046 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Low, J. J., Benin, A. I., Jakubczak, P., Abrahamian, J. F., Faheem, S. A., & Willis, R. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-10-07
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 15834-15842
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2167367493
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.