The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Separation of C5-Hydrocarbons on Microporous Materials: Complementary Performance of MOFs and Zeolites
Open accessAbstract
This work studies the liquid-phase separation of the aliphatic C(5)-diolefins, mono-olefins, and paraffins, a typical feed produced by a steam cracker, with a focus on the seldomly studied separation of the C(5)-diolefin isomers isoprene, trans-piperylene, and cis-piperylene. Three adsorbents are compared: the metal-organic framework MIL-96, which is an aluminum 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate, and two zeolites with CHA and LTA topology. All three materials have spacious cages that are accessible via narrow cage windows with a diameter of less than 0.5 nm. The mechanisms determining adsorption selectivities on the various materials are investigated. Within the diolefin fraction, MIL-96 and chabazite preferentially adsorb trans-piperylene from a mixture containing all three C(5)-diolefin isomers with high separation factors and a higher capacity compared to the reference zeolite 5A due to a more efficient packing of the trans isomer in the pores. Additionally, chabazite is able to separate cis-piperylene and isoprene based on size exclusion of the branched isomer. This makes chabazite suitable for separating all three diolefin isomers. Its use in separating linear from branched mono-olefins and paraffins is addressed as well. Furthermore, MIL-96 is the only material capable of separating all three diolefin isomers from C(5)-mono-olefins and paraffins. Finally, the MOF [Cu(3)(BTC)(2)] (BTC = benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) is shown to be able to separate C(5)-olefins from paraffins. On the basis of these observations, a flow scheme can be devised in which the C(5)-fraction can be completely separated using a combination of MOFs and zeolites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Adsorptive separation on metal–organic frameworks in the liquid phase
Van de Voorde, B., Bueken, B., Denayer, J., & De Vos, D. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00006d · Cited by 874
Self-citationAdsorption/catalytic properties of MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125
Kim, S.-N., Kim, J., Kim, H.-Y., Cho, H.-Y., & Ahn, W.-S. (2013) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.014 · Cited by 528
Li, B., Zhang, Y., Krishna, R., Yao, K., Han, Y., Wu, Z., Ma, D., Shi, Z., Pham, T., Space, B., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja502119z · Cited by 455
Discriminative Separation of Gases by a “Molecular Trapdoor” Mechanism in Chabazite Zeolites
Shang, J., Li, G., Singh, R., Gu, Q., Nairn, K. M., Bastow, T. J., Medhekar, N., Doherty, C. M., Hill, A. J., Liu, J. Z., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja309274y · Cited by 436
Metadata
- Authors
- Maes, M., Alaerts, L., Vermoortele, F., Ameloot, R., Couck, S., Finsy, V., Denayer, J. F. M., & De Vos, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2284-2292
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2051536359
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation of C5-Hydrocarbons on Microporous Materials: Complementary Performance of MOFs and Zeolites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja9088378
- The paper
- Maes, M., Alaerts, L., Vermoortele, F., Ameloot, R., Couck, S., Finsy, V., Denayer, J. F. M., & De Vos, D. E. (2010). Separation of C5-Hydrocarbons on Microporous Materials: Complementary Performance of MOFs and Zeolites. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9088378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.