The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control over Catenation in Metal−Organic Frameworks via Rational Design of the Organic Building Block
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), a hybrid class of materials comprising inorganic nodes and organic struts, have potential application in many areas due to their high surface areas and uniform pores and channels. One of the key challenges to be overcome in MOF synthesis is the strong propensity for catenation (growth of multiple independent networks within a given crystal), as catenation reduces cavity sizes and diminishes porosity. Here we demonstrate that rational design of organic building blocks, which act as strut-impervious scaffolds, can be exploited to generate highly desired noncatenated materials in a controlled fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Self-citation
Cited by
Valenzano, L., Civalleri, B., Chavan, S., Bordiga, S., Nilsen, M. H., Jakobsen, S., Lillerud, K. P., & Lamberti, C. (2011) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm1022882 · Cited by 1,919
Huang, A., Dou, W., & Caro, J. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja108774v · Cited by 555
Zheng, S.-T., Bu, J. T., Li, Y., Wu, T., Zuo, F., Feng, P., & Bu, X. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja106903p · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Farha, O. K., Malliakas, C. D., Kanatzidis, M. G., & Hupp, J. T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-29
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 950-952
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1970410293
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.