The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Important Are Quantum Mechanical Nuclear Motions in Enzyme Catalysis?
Abstract
The role of quantum mechanical nuclear motions in enzymatic reactions is examined by realistic simulations that take into account the fluctuations of an entire enzyme−substrate complex. This is done by using the quantized classical path (QCP) approach which is based on Feynman's path integral formulation. The calculations evaluate the quantum mechanical activation free energy and deuterium isotope effect for the proton transfer step in the catalytic reaction of carbonic anhydrase. The calculated and observed isotope effects are in very good agreement, thus demonstrating the potential of our approach in extracting mechanistic information. Furthermore, the value of the calculated quantum mechanical rate constant is in a good agreement with the corresponding observed value. This is significant since the evaluation of the ratio between the quantum mechanical rate constants of the reaction in the protein and in aqueous solution does not involve any adjustable parameter. The reliability of our calculations is based on the use of the empirical valence bond (EVB) method. This method does not try to represent the potential surfaces of the reacting atoms by a first principle approach (this is easily done by fitting the EVB surface to experimental and theoretical results) but rather evaluates the effect of moving these atoms from solution to the enzyme active site.The possible catalytic advantage of quantum mechanical nuclear motions is examined by comparing these effects in the enzyme and in a reference solution reaction. It is found that while quantum mechanical corrections to activation free energies of enzymatic reactions can be quite large they are not drastically different than the corresponding corrections in solution. Apparently the largest catalytic effects are due to reduction in the reorganization energy and Δ G 0 by the electrostatic effects of the preorganized environment of the protein active site. Nevertheless, small but non-negligible catalytic contributions can be associated with quantum mechanical effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrostatic Basis for Enzyme Catalysis
Warshel, A., Sharma, P. K., Kato, M., Xiang, Y., Liu, H., & Olsson, M. H. M. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0503106 · Cited by 1,444
Self-citationQ UANTUM M ECHANICAL M ETHODS FOR E NZYME K INETICS
Gao, J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.091301.150114 · Cited by 733
Theoretical Methods for the Description of the Solvent Effect in Biomolecular Systems
Orozco, M., & Luque, F. J. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990052a · Cited by 622
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Dynamical Contributions to Enzyme Catalysis: Critical Tests of A Popular Hypothesis
Olsson, M. H. M., Parson, W. W., & Warshel, A. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040427e · Cited by 289
Self-citationToward Theoretical Analyis of Long-Range Proton Transfer Kinetics in Biomolecular Pumps
König, P. H., Ghosh, N., Hoffmann, M., Elstner, M., Tajkhorshid, E., Frauenheim, T., & Cui, Q. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp052328q · Cited by 114
Transition-state Ensemble in Enzyme Catalysis: Possibility, Reality, or Necessity?
MA, B., KUMAR, S., TSAI, C.-J., HU, Z., & NUSSINOV, R. (2000) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.1097 · Cited by 86
Quinn, T. R., Steussy, C. N., Haines, B. E., Lei, J., Wang, W., Sheong, F. K., Stauffacher, C. V., Huang, X., Norrby, P.-O., Helquist, P., et al. (2021) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d1sc00102g · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, J.-K., & Warshel, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 11745-11751
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2053895127
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.