The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computed13C NMR Chemical Shifts via Empirically Scaled GIAO Shieldings and Molecular Mechanics Geometries. Conformation and Configuration from13C Shifts
Abstract
Accurate (rms error ∼3 ppm) predictions of 13 C chemical shifts are achieved for many of the common structural types of organic molecules through empirical scaling of shieldings calculated from gauge including atomic orbitals (GIAO) theory with a small basis set and with geometries obtained from computationally inexpensive molecular mechanics methods. Earlier GIAO calculations are shown to be much better at predicting relative chemical shifts when density functional theory with the B3LYP hybrid functional is used to account for electron correlation, in comparison with Hartree−Fock calculations. The GIAO isotropic shieldings need to be empirically scaled to achieve good numerical agreement with experimental δ C . GIAO calculations with different small basis sets are compared for a set of 38 model compounds containing C, H, O, and N with MMX and MM3 force fields and B3LYP/6-31G* optimizations providing the geometries. The best MM3-based results are obtained with B3LYP/3-21G(X,6-31+G*)//MM3 calculations in which the 3-21G basis set is augmented for heteroatoms with polarization and diffuse functions. The examples of the ( E )- and ( Z )-2-butenes, axial and equatorial methylcyclohexanes, exo - and endo -2-norbornanols, vulgarin and epivulgarin, and chair and twist-boat forms of 3α-hydroxy-2β-(4-morpholinyl)-5α H -androstan-17-one are examined to establish whether δ pred values could determine the structure if only one of each pair of structures were available to provide experimental δ C values. The δ pred from B3LYP/3-21G(X,6-31+G*)//MM3 calculations are adequate for addressing questions of conformation and relative stereochemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Cited by
Lodewyk, M. W., Siebert, M. R., & Tantillo, D. J. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200106v · Cited by 1,287
Bifulco, G., Dambruoso, P., Gomez-Paloma, L., & Riccio, R. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030733c · Cited by 577
Metadata
- Authors
- Forsyth, D. A., & Sebag, A. B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 9483-9494
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2052442881
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computed13C NMR Chemical Shifts via Empirically Scaled GIAO Shieldings and Molecular Mechanics Geometries. Conformation and Configuration from13C Shifts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja970112z
- The paper
- Forsyth, D. A., & Sebag, A. B. (1997). Computed13C NMR Chemical Shifts via Empirically Scaled GIAO Shieldings and Molecular Mechanics Geometries. Conformation and Configuration from13C Shifts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja970112z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.