Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computed13C NMR Chemical Shifts via Empirically Scaled GIAO Shieldings and Molecular Mechanics Geometries. Conformation and Configuration from13C Shifts

Forsyth, David A., Sebag, Albert B.·1997·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Accurate (rms error ∼3 ppm) predictions of 13 C chemical shifts are achieved for many of the common structural types of organic molecules through empirical scaling of shieldings calculated from gauge including atomic orbitals (GIAO) theory with a small basis set and with geometries obtained from computationally inexpensive molecular mechanics methods. Earlier GIAO calculations are shown to be much better at predicting relative chemical shifts when density functional theory with the B3LYP hybrid functional is used to account for electron correlation, in comparison with Hartree−Fock calculations. The GIAO isotropic shieldings need to be empirically scaled to achieve good numerical agreement with experimental δ C . GIAO calculations with different small basis sets are compared for a set of 38 model compounds containing C, H, O, and N with MMX and MM3 force fields and B3LYP/6-31G* optimizations providing the geometries. The best MM3-based results are obtained with B3LYP/3-21G(X,6-31+G*)//MM3 calculations in which the 3-21G basis set is augmented for heteroatoms with polarization and diffuse functions. The examples of the ( E )- and ( Z )-2-butenes, axial and equatorial methylcyclohexanes, exo - and endo -2-norbornanols, vulgarin and epivulgarin, and chair and twist-boat forms of 3α-hydroxy-2β-(4-morpholinyl)-5α H -androstan-17-one are examined to establish whether δ pred values could determine the structure if only one of each pair of structures were available to provide experimental δ C values. The δ pred from B3LYP/3-21G(X,6-31+G*)//MM3 calculations are adequate for addressing questions of conformation and relative stereochemistry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja970112z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Forsyth, D. A., & Sebag, A. B.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
119
Issue
40
Pages
9483-9494
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2052442881
Cited by
294
References
1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computed13C NMR Chemical Shifts via Empirically Scaled GIAO Shieldings and Molecular Mechanics Geometries. Conformation and Configuration from13C Shifts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja970112z
The paper
Forsyth, D. A., & Sebag, A. B. (1997). Computed13C NMR Chemical Shifts via Empirically Scaled GIAO Shieldings and Molecular Mechanics Geometries. Conformation and Configuration from13C Shifts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja970112z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.