The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temperature Dependence of Cation Distribution and Oxidation State in Magnetic Mn−Fe Ferrite Nanocrystals
Abstract
The magnetic properties of spinel nanoparticles are determined by crystal chemistry issues such as cation distribution and oxidation states. The cation distribution and oxidation state of Mn−Fe spinel nanoparticles have been systematically studied at various temperatures by using neutron diffraction and electron energy loss spectroscopy, respectively. The Mn−Fe spinel nanoparticles prepared by coprecipitation have a high degree of inversion with 61% of the tetrahedral sites occupied by Fe 3+ cations. The degree of inversion correlates with the distribution expected from random occupancy of cations consisting of Fe (60%) and Mn (40%). After heat treatment in a vacuum, the cation distribution reaches an equilibrium state with a 29% inversion. Initially, one-half of the Mn cations are in the +3 oxidation state and the other half are in the +2 oxidation state. Mn 3+ cations are slowly and irreversibly reduced to Mn 2+ with increasing temperature. When the temperature approaches 600 °C, all Mn cations are in the +2 state. These results provide direct evidence for the temperature-dependent change of crystal chemistry in Mn−Fe spinel nanoparticles, which has been closely related with the controversy on attributing the changes in the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles to crystallite size effect. These results will also provide an understanding of how to control crystal chemistry in order to control the properties of these magnetic nanoparticles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transmission Electron Microscopy of Shape-Controlled Nanocrystals and Their Assemblies
Wang, Z. L. (2000) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp993593c · Cited by 2,137
Self-citationShape Control of Semiconductor and Metal Oxide Nanocrystals through Nonhydrolytic Colloidal Routes
Jun, Y., Choi, J., & Cheon, J. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200503821 · Cited by 1,123
Kratz, H., Taupitz, M., Ariza de Schellenberger, A., Kosch, O., Eberbeck, D., Wagner, S., Trahms, L., Hamm, B., & Schnorr, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190214 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z. J., Wang, Z. L., Chakoumakos, B. C., & Yin, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-02-05
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1800-1804
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1977018826
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature Dependence of Cation Distribution and Oxidation State in Magnetic Mn−Fe Ferrite Nanocrystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja973085l
- The paper
- Zhang, Z. J., Wang, Z. L., Chakoumakos, B. C., & Yin, J. S. (1998). Temperature Dependence of Cation Distribution and Oxidation State in Magnetic Mn−Fe Ferrite Nanocrystals. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja973085l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.