Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Surface Structure of Sulfated Zirconia: Periodic ab Initio Study of Sulfuric Acid Adsorbed on ZrO2(101) and ZrO2(001)

Haase, Frank, Sauer, Joachim·1998·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Periodic plane wave pseudopotential calculations based on density functional theory are performed to reveal the structure of sulfur species on the surface of tetragonal zirconia. The most stable configurations found are a tridentate sulfate anion on the (101) surface and an SO 3 complex on the (001) surface which is also 3-fold coordinated but unlike the sulfate anion is bonded to the surface via two oxygen atoms and the sulfur atom. The adsorption energies of these tridentate complexes are −322 kJ/mol for the former and −467 kJ/mol for the latter structure. On the (001) surface we also identified a bidentate sulfate complex as a stable structure with an adsorption energy of −408 kJ/mol. However, as MD simulations at a temperature of 800 K show, this bidentate configuration is transformed into a 3-fold coordinated structure accompanied by a reconstruction in the oxygen top layer. The observed IR spectra can be explained by the presence of sulfate anions on both crystallographic planes studied in this work. The calculated vibrational frequencies of the two tridentate surface complexes exhibit a gap of about 360 cm - 1 between the ν(S O) and ν(S−O) stretching bands, which agrees well with experimental IR spectra of sulfated zirconia samples calcined at about 900 K. For the bidentate sulfate complex as well as for a less stable hydrogen sulfate anion we calculate ν(S−O) stretching frequencies in the range 1250−900 cm - 1 which qualitatively explain the observed IR spectra of sulfated zirconia samples calcined at 800 K. On the basis of the calculated deprotonation energies, which are in the range 1350−1550 kJ/mol, we conclude that the hydroxyl groups on the two surfaces studied are less acidic than bridged hydroxyls in zeolites, regardless of the presence or absence of sulfate anions. The −1170 kJ/mol proton affinity of oxygen atoms on the (001) surface indicates that the zirconia surface is a strong base. This result and our finding of a strong electrostatic interaction with the surface explain why adsorbed sulfuric acid is completely deprotonated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja9825534

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Haase, F., & Sauer, J.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
120
Issue
51
Pages
13503-13512
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2015578139
Cited by
186
References
1
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.