The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Secondary Structure on the Fragmentation of Protonated Peptides
Abstract
The influence of acid−base interactions on the gas-phase dissociation of a series of protonated peptides was investigated. Peptides containing both acidic residues [aspartic (D), glutamic (E), and cysteic acid (C*)] and basic residues [arginine (R)] were dissociated by different activation methods that allow different time frames for dissociation. The synthetic peptides investigated differ systematically in the number and position of arginine residue(s) and include R L D IFS D F R, R L E IFS E F R, R L D IFS D F, L D IFS D F R, L E IFS E F R, L D IFS D F, R L C IFS C F R, R LAIFS C F R, R L C IFSAF R, R L C *IFS C *F R, R LAIFS C *F R, and R L C *IFSAF R (where C* denotes cysteic acid). It was observed that the number of ionizing protons relative to the number of basic residues in peptides containing acidic residues is a contributing factor in the fragmentation behavior. Nonselective cleavages along the peptide backbone occur when the number of ionizing protons exceeds the number of arginine residues, while dominant cleavages adjacent to the acidic residues predominate when the number of ionizing protons equals the number of arginine residues. In particular, enhanced b 7 /y 2, and y 6, y 2 singly charged fragment ions were detected for the doubly protonated R L D IFS D F R and singly protonated L D IFS D F R precursor ions, respectively. These are the result of enhanced cleavage of the DF bond in the doubly protonated R L D IFS D F R and the DI plus DF bonds in the singly protonated L D IFS D F R . Abundant d and b-H 2 SO 3 product ions indicative of specific cleavages adjacent to C* were observed in the cysteic acid-containing peptides when the number of ionizing protons equaled the number of arginine residues. Dominant cleavages at glutamic acid(s) were also observed for doubly protonated R L E IFS E F R and singly protonated L E IFS E F R when longer dissociation times were available. Preferential cleavage(s) at the acidic residue(s) occurs on the microsecond time scale for aspartic acid and greater than microsecond time scale for glutamic acid. This different behavior for aspartic vs glutamic acid is likely to have important implications in mass spectrometry-based sequencing strategies. However, the product ion spectra of most of the peptides investigated ( R L D IFS D F R, R L D IFS D F, L D IFS D F R, L E IFS E F R, and L D IFS D F) were found to be very similar under the array of activation methods used. These included surface-induced dissociation in a quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer, high-energy collision-induced dissociation in a hybrid sector/time-of flight mass spectrometer, and sustained off-resonance irradiation in a Fourier transform mass spectrometer. The unique fragmentation of peptides containing basic and acidic residues is rationalized as evidence for the existence of gas-phase intramolecular solvation that strongly influences their fragmentation. We propose that it is the available acidic proton(s) on the acidic residue(s) not involved in solvating the protonated arginine that is initiating the dominant cleavage(s). Electrospray ionization/SID fragmentation efficiency curves (percent fragmentation versus laboratory collision energy) are also presented for these peptides. The positions of the curves for the doubly protonated, double arginine-containing peptides ( R L D IFS D F R, R L E IFS E F R ) relative to those for the doubly protonated but single arginine-containing peptides (L D IFS D F R, R L D IFS D F) are consistent with localization of charge at the two R side chains in the former peptides and formation of a heterogeneous population of protonated peptides in the latter peptides. These curve positions and the nonselective fragmentation in the peptide devoid of arginine residues (L D IFS D F) are consistent with the mobile proton model, which relates ease of fragmentation to ease of nonselective intramolecular proton transfer within the protonated peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers.
Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C., & Chait, B. T. (1991) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00024a716 · Cited by 1,930
Covey, T. R., Huang, E. C., & Henion, J. D. (1991) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00013a003 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Fragmentation pathways of protonated peptides
Paizs, B., & Suhai, S. (2005) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20024 · Cited by 1,118
Reactions of polypeptide ions with electrons in the gas phase
Zubarev, R. A. (2003) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.10042 · Cited by 431
Performance Characteristics of Electron Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
Good, D. M., Wirtala, M., McAlister, G. C., & Coon, J. J. (2007) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m700073-mcp200 · Cited by 396
Proteomics of Integral Membrane ProteinsTheory and Application
Speers, A. E., & Wu, C. C. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068286z · Cited by 325
Prediction of Low-Energy Collision-Induced Dissociation Spectra of Peptides
Zhang, Z. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac049951b · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsaprailis, G., Nair, H., Somogyi, Á., Wysocki, V. H., Zhong, W., Futrell, J. H., Summerfield, S. G., & Gaskell, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-05-22
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5142-5154
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2018408953
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.