Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7,465

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrophilicity Index

Parr, Robert G., Szentpály, László v., Liu, Shubin·1999·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Prompted by a recent paper by Maynard and co-workers (Maynard, A. T.; Huang, M.; Rice, W. G.; Covel, D. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 11578), we propose that a specific property of a chemical species, the square of its electronegativity divided by its chemical hardness, be taken as defining its electrophilicity index. We tabulate this quantity for a number of atomic and molecular species, for two different models of the energy−electron number relationships, and we show that it measures the second-order energy change of an electrophile as it is saturated with electrons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja983494x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 7,465

Metadata

Authors
Parr, R. G., Szentpály, L. V., & Liu, S.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1999-02-18
Volume
121
Issue
9
Pages
1922-1924
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W4231649355
Cited by
7,465
References
0
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophilicity Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja983494x
The paper
Parr, R. G., Szentpály, L. V., & Liu, S. (1999). Electrophilicity Index. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja983494x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.