The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Selectivity of GGG Triplets toward One-Electron Oxidation in B-Form DNA
Abstract
The selectivity of 5‘-TGGGT-3‘ and 5‘-CGGGC-3‘ sequences toward photoinduced one-electron oxidation was examined experimentally and by ab initio molecular orbital (MO) calculations. It was confirmed experimentally that G 2 of 5‘-TG 1 G 2 G 3 T-3‘ is more reactive than G 1, while for 5‘-CG 1 G 2 G 3 C-3‘ the selectivity is reversed, that is, G 1 > G 2 . The ab initio MO analyses were performed to elucidate the difference of the selectivities between 5‘-TGGGT-3‘ and 5‘-CGGGC-3‘ sequences. For the 5‘-TGGG-3‘ sequence, the spin densities of G 1 • and G 2 • in neutral radical (5‘-TG 1 G 2 G 3 -3‘) • have a similar pattern, and the shapes of the corresponding radical orbitals are also very similar. It was concluded that the selectivity is due to the stability of the (5‘-TG 1 G 2 G 3 -3‘) • neutral radicals; that is, 5‘-TG 1 G 2 • G 3 -3‘ is more stable in energy than 5‘-TG 1 • G 2 G 3 -3‘. For the 5‘-CGGG-3‘ sequence, it was found that the spin density on N1 of G 1 • in neutral radical (5‘-CG 1 G 2 G 3 -3‘) • is distinguishably different from the corresponding spin density of G 2 •, which has a pattern similar to those of G 1 • and G 2 • in 5‘-TG 1 G 2 G 3 -3‘. The radical orbital (SOMO) of G 1 • is delocalized on guanine base and up to the paired cytosine base, while the radical orbital of G 2 • is essentially localized on guanine base. This drastic difference of the electron population in the radical orbitals, caused by the stacking interaction with the 5‘-side G of the opposite strand, can explain why G 1 is more reactive than G 2 in the 5‘-CG 1 G 2 G 3 -3‘ sequence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxidative Nucleobase Modifications Leading to Strand Scission
Burrows, C. J., & Muller, J. G. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960421s · Cited by 1,736
Reactions of oxyl radicals with DNA
Breen, A. P., & Murphy, J. A. (1995) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(94)00209-3 · Cited by 1,038
Oxidative DNA damage through long-range electron transfer
Hall, D. B., Holmlin, R. E., & Barton, J. K. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382731a0 · Cited by 825
Cited by
Stubbe, J., Nocera, D. G., Yee, C. S., & Chang, M. C. Y. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020421u · Cited by 823
Berlin, Y. A., Burin, A. L., & Ratner, M. A. (2001) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja001496n · Cited by 326
Nucleotide-Resolution Genome-Wide Mapping of Oxidative DNA Damage by Click-Code-Seq
Wu, J., McKeague, M., & Sturla, S. J. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03715 · Cited by 123
UV and ionizing radiations induced DNA damage, differences and similarities
Ravanat, J.-L., & Douki, T. (2016) · Radiation Physics and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.07.007 · Cited by 94
DNA−Protein Cross-Linking via Guanine Oxidation: Dependence upon Protein and Photosensitizer
Kurbanyan, K., Nguyen, K. L., To, P., Rivas, E. V., Lueras, A. M. K., Kosinski, C., Steryo, M., González, A., Mah, D. A., & Stemp, E. D. A. (2003) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi020713p · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoshioka, Y., Kitagawa, Y., Takano, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Nakamura, T., & Saito, I.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 8712-8719
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2041628963
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Selectivity of GGG Triplets toward One-Electron Oxidation in B-Form DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja991032t
- The paper
- Yoshioka, Y., Kitagawa, Y., Takano, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Nakamura, T., & Saito, I. (1999). Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Selectivity of GGG Triplets toward One-Electron Oxidation in B-Form DNA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja991032t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.