Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Femtosecond Excited-State Dynamics of an Iron(II) Polypyridyl Solar Cell Sensitizer Model

Monat, Jeremy E., McCusker, James K.·2000·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Time-resolved electronic absorption spectroscopy on a ∼100 fs time scale has been used to study excited-state dynamics in an Fe II polypyridyl complex. [Fe(tren(py) 3 )] 2+, where tren(py) 3 is tris(2-pyridylmethyliminoethyl)amine, forms a 1 MLCT excited state upon irradiation at 400 nm and is known from previous studies to undergo relaxation to a low-lying ligand-field state having S = 2. Static absorption measurements on the low-spin parent complex and a high-spin analogue have been used to identify spectroscopic signatures for the S = 0 and S = 2 ligand-field states, respectively. Comparison of these data with femtosecond and nanosecond differential absorption spectra establishes that the net Δ S = 2 intersystem crossing is essentially complete in well under 1 ps. Spectroelectochemistry on [Fe(tren(py) 3 )] 2+ has also been used to find an absorption feature characteristic of the initially formed 1 MLCT state at λ ≳ 600 nm. Analysis of single-wavelength kinetics data in this spectral region reveals that the charge-transfer → ligand-field manifold conversion, observed here for the first time, occurs with a nearly instrument-response limited time constant of less than 100 fs. Additional dynamics occurring with a time constant of 8 ± 3 ps are tentatively assigned as vibrational cooling in the high-spin ligand-field state. The ultrafast intersystem crossing is interpreted as calling into question the utility of spin selection rules for understanding and predicting excited-state relaxation dynamics in transition metal complexes, whereas the sub-100 fs MLCT → LF conversion is discussed in terms of its implications for the dynamics of electron injection in Fe II -sensitized TiO 2 -based solar cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja992436o

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Monat, J. E., & McCusker, J. K.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2000-04-12
Volume
122
Issue
17
Pages
4092-4097
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2120752329
Cited by
326
References
24
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Femtosecond Excited-State Dynamics of an Iron(II) Polypyridyl Solar Cell Sensitizer Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja992436o
The paper
Monat, J. E., & McCusker, J. K. (2000). Femtosecond Excited-State Dynamics of an Iron(II) Polypyridyl Solar Cell Sensitizer Model. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja992436o

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.