The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrogen Bonding in DNA Base Pairs: Reconciliation of Theory and Experiment
Open accessAbstract
Up till now, there has been a significant disagreement between theory and experiment regarding hydrogen bond lengths in Watson−Crick base pairs. To investigate the possible sources of this discrepancy, we have studied numerous model systems for adenine−thymine (AT) and guanine−cytosine (GC) base pairs at various levels (i.e., BP86, PW91, and BLYP) of nonlocal density functional theory (DFT) in combination with different Slater-type orbital (STO) basis sets. Best agreement with available gas-phase experimental A−T and G−C bond enthalpies (−12.1 and −21.0 kcal/mol) is obtained at the BP86/TZ2P level, which (for 298 K) yields −11.8 and −23.8 kcal/mol. However, the computed hydrogen bond lengths show again the notorious discrepancy with experimental values. The origin of this discrepancy is not the use of the plain nucleic bases as models for nucleotides: the disagreement with experiment remains no matter if we use hydrogen, methyl, deoxyribose, or 5‘-deoxyribose monophosphate as the substituents at N9 and N1 of the purine and pyrimidine bases, respectively. Even the BP86/DZP geometry of the Watson−Crick-type dimer of deoxyadenylyl-3‘,5‘-deoxyuridine including one Na + ion (with 123 atoms our largest model for sodium adenylyl-3‘,5‘-uridine hexahydrate, the crystal of which had been studied experimentally with the use of X-ray diffraction) still shows this disagreement with experiment. The source of the divergence turns out to be the molecular environment (water, sugar hydroxyl groups, counterions) of the base pairs in the crystals studied experimentally. This has been missing, so far, in all theoretical models. After we had incorporated the major elements of this environment in our model systems, excellent agreement between our BP86/TZ2P geometries and the X-ray crystal structures was achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior
Becke, A. D. (1988) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.38.3098 · Cited by 53,711
Perdew, J. P., Chevary, J. A., Vosko, S. H., Jackson, K. A., Pederson, M. R., Singh, D. J., & Fiolhais, C. (1992) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.46.6671 · Cited by 22,269
Vosko, S. H., Wilk, L., & Nusair, M. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1139/p80-159 · Cited by 20,768
Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas
Perdew, J. P. (1986) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.33.8822 · Cited by 18,777
Perdew, J. P., Chevary, J. A., Vosko, S. H., Jackson, K. A., Pederson, M. R., Singh, D. J., & Fiolhais, C. (1993) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.4978.2 · Cited by 17,144
Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid
WATSON, J. D., & CRICK, F. H. C. (1953) · Nature · doi:10.1038/171737a0 · Cited by 13,584
Introduction to Solid State Physics
Kittel, C., & Dexter, D. L. (1953) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933590 · Cited by 13,240
An introduction to hydrogen bonding
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-3309 · Cited by 6,199
Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure
Saenger, W. (1984) · Springer Advanced Texts in Chemistry · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5190-3 · Cited by 4,150
Cited by
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Self-citationSupramolecular cancer nanotheranostics
Zhou, J., Rao, L., Yu, G., Cook, T. R., Chen, X., & Huang, F. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00011f · Cited by 411
Brovarets, O. O., & Hovorun, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2012.755795 · Cited by 148
Adenine Tautomers: Relative Stabilities, Ionization Energies, and Mismatch with Cytosine
Fonseca Guerra, C., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Saha, S., & Wang, F. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp057275r · Cited by 127
Self-citationThe strength of the template effect attracting nucleotides to naked DNA
Kervio, E., Claasen, B., Steiner, U. E., & Richert, C. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku314 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Fonseca Guerra, C., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Snijders, J. G., & Baerends, E. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-04-14
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4117-4128
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2030092313
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen Bonding in DNA Base Pairs: Reconciliation of Theory and Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja993262d
- The paper
- Fonseca Guerra, C., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Snijders, J. G., & Baerends, E. J. (2000). Hydrogen Bonding in DNA Base Pairs: Reconciliation of Theory and Experiment. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja993262d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.