The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Studies of the Mechanism for Proton and Hydride Transfer in Liver Alcohol Dehydrogenase
Abstract
In this paper we present computational studies directed at elucidating the mechanism of the oxidation of benzyl alcohol by liver alcohol dehydrogenase (LADH). This enzyme reaction involves a hydride transfer from the alcohol substrate to the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide coenzyme and a proton relay that deprotonates the alcohol substrate. Electronic structure calculations at various levels of theory were performed on a 148-atom model of the active site, and classical molecular dynamics simulations were performed on the entire solvated LADH dimer. These calculations support the hypothesis that alcohol deprotonation occurs prior to the hydride transfer step and that the alcohol deprotonation facilitates the hydride transfer by lowering the barrier for hydride transfer. In this postulated mechanism, the alcohol deprotonation leads to a zinc-bound alkoxide ion, and the subsequent hydride transfer leads to the benzaldehyde product. The calculations indicate that the zinc-bound alkoxide forms a strong hydrogen bond to Ser48 and that hydride transfer is accompanied by a weakening of this hydrogen bond. The results also suggest that the barrier to hydride transfer is lowered by the electrostatic interaction between the substrate alkoxide oxygen and the zinc counterion in the active site. The interaction of the alkoxide oxygen lone pair orbitals with the zinc competes with the formation of the double bond required for the aldehyde product, resulting in an earlier, more alcohol-like transition state and thus a lower activation energy barrier. In addition, the interaction between the alkoxide oxygen and the zinc restricts the dynamical motion of the substrate, decreasing the average donor−acceptor distance for hydride transfer and hence lowering the activation energy barrier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Proton-coupled electron transfer
Huynh, M. H. V., & Meyer, T. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0500030 · Cited by 1,659
Synthetic Analogues Relevant to the Structure and Function of Zinc Enzymes
Parkin, G. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0206263 · Cited by 931
Q UANTUM M ECHANICAL M ETHODS FOR E NZYME K INETICS
Gao, J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.091301.150114 · Cited by 733
Probing the Threshold to H Atom Transfer Along a Hydrogen-Bonded Ammonia Wire
Tanner, C., Manca, C., & Leutwyler, S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091708 · Cited by 288
Is a “Proton Wire” Concerted or Stepwise? A Model Study of Proton Transfer in Carbonic Anhydrase
Cui, Q., & Karplus, M. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp021931v · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Agarwal, P. K., Webb, S. P., & Hammes-Schiffer, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-04-26
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4803-4812
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2074711797
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.