Cited by 55Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

The Emergence of RNA from the Heterogeneous Products of Prebiotic Nucleotide Synthesis

Open access
Kim, Seohyun Chris, O’Flaherty, Derek K., Giurgiu, Constantin, Zhou, Lijun, Szostak, Jack W.·2021·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Recent advances in prebiotic chemistry are beginning to outline plausible pathways for the synthesis of the canonical ribonucleotides and their assembly into oligoribonucleotides. However, these reaction pathways suggest that many noncanonical nucleotides are likely to have been generated alongside the standard ribonucleotides. Thus, the oligomerization of prebiotically synthesized nucleotides is likely to have led to a highly heterogeneous collection of oligonucleotides comprised of a wide range of types of nucleotides connected by a variety of backbone linkages. How then did relatively homogeneous RNA emerge from this primordial heterogeneity? Here we focus on nonenzymatic template-directed primer extension as a process that would have strongly enriched for homogeneous RNA over the course of multiple cycles of replication. We review the effects on copying the kinetics of nucleotides with altered nucleobase and sugar moieties, when they are present as activated monomers and when they are incorporated into primer and template oligonucleotides. We also discuss three variations in backbone connectivity, all of which are nonheritable and regenerate native RNA upon being copied. The kinetic superiority of RNA synthesis suggests that nonenzymatic copying served as a chemical selection mechanism that allowed relatively homogeneous RNA to emerge from a complex mixture of prebiotically synthesized nucleotides and oligonucleotides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.0c12955

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Szostak and co-workers found that 5′-5′imidazolium bridged dinucleotides improved fidelity and reaction rates by virtue of higher template-affinity and geometrical positioning of the reactive species.

    “Szostak and co-workers found that 5′-5′imidazolium bridged dinucleotides, which are formed spontaneously in the nucleotide activation reaction, improved fidelity and reaction rates by virtue of higher template-affinity and geometrical positioning of the reactive species.12−14”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S. C., O’Flaherty, D. K., Giurgiu, C., Zhou, L., & Szostak, J. W.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Szostak, Jack W.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
143
Issue
9
Pages
3267-3279
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3130279262
Cited by
55
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1607034)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Simons Foundation (290363)
  • Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Nature et Technologies
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
nucleotide activation, nucleobase modification, sugar modification, chemical selection
MeSH terms
Nucleotides, RNA, Templates, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review