The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Altering Ligand Fields in Single-Atom Sites through Second-Shell Anion Modulation Boosts the Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Abstract
Single-atom catalysts based on metal–N 4 moieties and anchored on carbon supports (defined as M–N–C) are promising for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Among those, M–N–C catalysts with 4d and 5d transition metal (TM 4d,5d ) centers are much more durable and not susceptible to the undesirable Fenton reaction, especially compared with 3d transition metal based ones. However, the ORR activity of these TM 4d,5d –N–C catalysts is still far from satisfactory; thus far, there are few discussions about how to accurately tune the ligand fields of single-atom TM 4d,5d sites in order to improve their catalytic properties. Herein, we leverage single-atom Ru–N–C as a model system and report an S-anion coordination strategy to modulate the catalyst’s structure and ORR performance. The S anions are identified to bond with N atoms in the second coordination shell of Ru centers, which allows us to manipulate the electronic configuration of central Ru sites. The S-anion-coordinated Ru–N–C catalyst delivers not only promising ORR activity but also outstanding long-term durability, superior to those of commercial Pt/C and most of the near-term single-atom catalysts. DFT calculations reveal that the high ORR activity is attributed to the lower adsorption energy of ORR intermediates at Ru sites. Metal–air batteries using this catalyst in the cathode side also exhibit fast kinetics and excellent stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent advancements in Pt and Pt-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction
Nie, Y., Li, L., & Wei, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00484a · Cited by 2,156
Single-atom Rh/N-doped carbon electrocatalyst for formic acid oxidation
Xiong, Y., Dong, J., Huang, Z.-Q., Xin, P., Chen, W., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Jin, Z., Xing, W., Zhuang, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0665-x · Cited by 610
Zhang, C., Sha, J., Fei, H., Liu, M., Yazdi, S., Zhang, J., Zhong, Q., Zou, X., Zhao, N., Yu, H., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b02148 · Cited by 545
Cited by
Boosting Oxygen Electrocatalytic Activity of Fe–N–C Catalysts by Phosphorus Incorporation
Zhou, Y., Lu, R., Tao, X., Qiu, Z., Chen, G., Yang, J., Zhao, Y., Feng, X., & Müllen, K. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c12933 · Cited by 567
Microenvironment Engineering of Single/Dual‐Atom Catalysts for Electrocatalytic Application
Gao, Y., Liu, B., & Wang, D. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202209654 · Cited by 319
Wang, X., Zhou, X., Li, C., Yao, H., Zhang, C., Zhou, J., Xu, R., Chu, L., Wang, H., Gu, M., et al. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202204021 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, J., Liu, H., Zou, P., Zhang, R., Wang, C., & Xin, H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-01-28
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2197-2207
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W4210692642
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.