The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defects Tune the Strong Metal–Support Interactions in Copper Supported on Defected Titanium Dioxide Catalysts for CO2 Reduction
Abstract
A highly active and stable Cu-based catalyst for CO 2 to CO conversion was demonstrated by creating a strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) between Cu active sites and the TiO 2 -coated dendritic fibrous nano-silica (DFNS/TiO 2 ) support. The DFNS/TiO 2 –Cu10 catalyst showed excellent catalytic performance with a CO productivity of 5350 mmol g –1 h –1 (i.e., 53,506 mmol g Cu –1 h –1 ), surpassing that of almost all copper-based thermal catalysts, with 99.8% selectivity toward CO. Even after 200 h of reaction, the catalyst remained active. Moderate initial agglomeration and high dispersion of nanoparticles (NPs) due to SMSI made the catalysts stable. Electron energy loss spectroscopy confirmed the strong interactions between copper NPs and the TiO 2 surface, supported by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The H 2 -temperature programmed reduction (TPR) study showed α, β, and γ H 2 -TPR signals, further confirming the presence of SMSI between Cu and TiO 2 . In situ Raman and UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy studies provided insights into the role of oxygen vacancies and Ti 3+ centers, which were produced by hydrogen, then consumed by CO 2, and then again regenerated by hydrogen. These continuous defect generation–regeneration processes during the progress of the reaction allowed long-term high catalytic activity and stability. The in situ studies and oxygen storage complete capacity indicated the key role of oxygen vacancies during catalysis. The in situ time-resolved Fourier transform infrared study provided an understanding of the formation of various reaction intermediates and their conversion to products with reaction time. Based on these observations, we have proposed a CO 2 reduction mechanism, which follows a redox pathway assisted by hydrogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide
Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., & Garten, R. L. (1978) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00469a029 · Cited by 3,188
The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950-2000
Dry, M. E. (2002) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00453-9 · Cited by 2,061
Cited by
Metal–support interactions in metal oxide-supported atomic, cluster, and nanoparticle catalysis
Leybo, D., Etim, U. J., Monai, M., Bare, S. R., Zhong, Z., & Vogt, C. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00527a · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Belgamwar, R., Verma, R., Das, T., Chakraborty, S., Sarawade, P., & Polshettiwar, V.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-04-05
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8634-8646
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W4362640340
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defects Tune the Strong Metal–Support Interactions in Copper Supported on Defected Titanium Dioxide Catalysts for CO2 Reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.3c01336
- The paper
- Belgamwar, R., Verma, R., Das, T., Chakraborty, S., Sarawade, P., & Polshettiwar, V. (2023). Defects Tune the Strong Metal–Support Interactions in Copper Supported on Defected Titanium Dioxide Catalysts for CO2 Reduction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c01336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.