Solid-Phase Compatible Silane-Based Cleavable Linker Enables Custom Isobaric Quantitative Chemoproteomics
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Mass spectrometry-based chemoproteomics has emerged as an enabling technology for functional biology and drug discovery. To address limitations of established chemoproteomics workflows, including cumbersome reagent synthesis and low throughput sample preparation, here, we established the silane-based cleavable isotopically labeled proteomics (sCIP) method. The sCIP method is enabled by a high yielding and scalable route to dialkoxydiphenylsilane fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (DADPS-Fmoc)-protected amino acid building blocks, which enable the facile synthesis of customizable, isotopically labeled, and chemically cleavable biotin capture reagents. sCIP is compatible with both MS1- and MS2-based quantitation, and the sCIP-MS2 method is distinguished by its click-assembled isobaric tags in which the reporter group is encoded in the sCIP capture reagent and balancer in the pan cysteine-reactive probe. The sCIP-MS2 workflow streamlines sample preparation with early stage isobaric labeling and sample pooling, allowing for high coverage and increased sample throughput via customized low cost six-plex sample multiplexing. When paired with a custom FragPipe data analysis workflow and applied to cysteine-reactive fragment screens, sCIP proteomics revealed established and unprecedented cysteine-ligand pairs, including the discovery that mitochondrial uncoupling agent FCCP acts as a covalent-reversible cysteine-reactive electrophile.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems
Backus, K. M., Correia, B. E., Lum, K. M., Forli, S., Horning, B. D., González-Páez, G. E., Chatterjee, S., Lanning, B. R., Teijaro, J. R., Olson, A. J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18002 · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Self-citationLigand and Target Discovery by Fragment-Based Screening in Human Cells
Parker, C. G., Galmozzi, A., Wang, Y., Correia, B. E., Sasaki, K., Joslyn, C. M., Kim, A. S., Cavallaro, C. L., Lawrence, R. M., Johnson, S. R., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.029 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Rapid Covalent-Probe Discovery by Electrophile-Fragment Screening
Resnick, E., Bradley, A., Gan, J., Douangamath, A., Krojer, T., Sethi, R., Geurink, P. P., Aimon, A., Amitai, G., Bellini, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b02822 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Efficient targeted degradation via reversible and irreversible covalent PROTACs
Gabizon, R., Shraga, A., Gehrtz, P., Livnah, E., Gurwicz, N., Avram, L., Unger, T., Albeck, S., Shulman, Z., & London, N. (2020) · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.11494398.v1 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Hashimoto, M., Majima, E., Goto, S., Shinohara, Y., & Terada, H. (1999) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi9822978 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Burton, N. R., Polasky, D. A., Shikwana, F., Ofori, S., Yan, T., Geiszler, D. J., Veiga Leprevost, F. D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., & Backus, K. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
- Corresponding author
- Backus, Keriann M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-09-22
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 21303-21318
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- PMC
- PMC11895830
- OpenAlex
- W4386954696
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (U24CA271037)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (D19AP00041)
- Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
- Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (T31DT1800)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- chemoproteomics, cleavable linkers, isobaric labeling, click chemistry, sample multiplexing, FCCP, mitochondrial uncoupling, FragPipe
- MeSH terms
- Cysteine, Indicators and Reagents, Silanes, Mass Spectrometry, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review