How Robust Is the Ligand Binding Transition State?
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
For many drug targets, it has been shown that the kinetics of drug binding (e.g., on rate and off rate) is more predictive of drug efficacy than thermodynamic quantities alone. This motivates the development of predictive computational models that can be used to optimize compounds on the basis of their kinetics. The structural details underpinning these computational models are found not only in the bound state but also in the short-lived ligand binding transition states. Although transition states cannot be directly observed experimentally due to their extremely short lifetimes, recent successes have demonstrated that modeling the ligand binding transition state is possible with the help of enhanced sampling molecular dynamics methods. Previously, we generated unbinding paths for an inhibitor of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) with a residence time of 11 min. Here, we computationally modeled unbinding events with the weighted ensemble method REVO (resampling of ensembles by variation optimization) for five additional inhibitors of sEH with residence times ranging from 14.25 to 31.75 min, with average prediction accuracy within an order of magnitude. The unbinding ensembles are analyzed in detail, focusing on features of the ligand binding transition state ensembles (TSEs). We find that ligands with similar bound poses can show significant differences in their ligand binding TSEs, in terms of their spatial distribution and protein-ligand interactions. However, we also find similarities across the TSEs when examining more general features such as ligand degrees of freedom. Together these findings show significant challenges for rational, kinetics-based drug design.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction
Pérez-Hernández, G., Paul, F., Giorgino, T., De Fabritiis, G., & Noé, F. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4811489 · Cited by 990 · see citing works
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Schwantes, C. R., & Pande, V. S. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300878a · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Gentile, F., Yaacoub, J. C., Gleave, J., Fernandez, M., Ton, A.-T., Ban, F., Stern, A., & Cherkasov, A. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00659-2 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Bose, S., Lotz, S. D., Deb, I., Shuck, M., Lee, K. S. S., & Dickson, A.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dickson, Alex
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-11-09
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 25318-25331
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- PMC
- PMC11059145
- OpenAlex
- W4388522475
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Division of Mathematical Sciences (DMS1761320)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG080186)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM130794)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- unbinding kinetics, soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors, enhanced sampling molecular dynamics, residence time, protein-ligand interactions, drug binding kinetics
- MeSH terms
- Kinetics, Ligands, Protein Binding, Thermodynamics, Drug Design, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review