Integrating Dynamic Network Analysis with AI for Enhanced Epitope Prediction in PD-L1:Affibody Interactions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Understanding binding epitopes involved in protein-protein interactions and accurately determining their structure are long-standing goals with broad applicability in industry and biomedicine. Although various experimental methods for binding epitope determination exist, these approaches are typically low throughput and cost-intensive. Computational methods have potential to accelerate epitope predictions; however, recently developed artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods frequently fail to predict epitopes of synthetic binding domains with few natural homologues. Here we have developed an integrated method employing generalized-correlation-based dynamic network analysis on multiple molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories, initiated from AlphaFold2Multimer structures, to unravel the structure and binding epitope of the therapeutic PD-L1:Affibody complex. Both AlphaFold2 and conventional molecular dynamics trajectory analysis were ineffective in distinguishing between two proposed binding models, parallel and perpendicular. However, our integrated approach, utilizing dynamic network analysis, demonstrated that the perpendicular mode was significantly more stable. These predictions were validated using a suite of experimental epitope mapping protocols, including cross-linking mass spectrometry and next-generation sequencing-based deep mutational scanning. Conversely, AlphaFold3 failed to predict a structure bound in the perpendicular pose, highlighting the necessity for exploratory research in the search for binding epitopes and challenging the notion that AI-generated protein structures can be accepted without scrutiny. Our research underscores the potential of employing dynamic network analysis to enhance AI-based structure predictions for more accurate identification of protein-protein interaction interfaces.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
Affibody molecules as engineered protein drugs
Frejd, F. Y., & Kim, K.-T. (2017) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/emm.2017.35 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Gomes, D. E. B., Yang, B., Vanella, R., Nash, M. A., & Bernardi, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Nash, Michael A.
- Bernardi, Rafael C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-08-15
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 23842-23853
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- PMC
- PMC10871313
- OpenAlex
- W4401609954
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB-2143787)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R24-GM145965)
- Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- PD-L1, affibody, protein-protein interaction, dynamic network analysis, generalized correlation, molecular dynamics trajectories, AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, epitope mapping, deep mutational scanning, cross-linking mass spectrometry, protein structure prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review