Cited by 69DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesSupramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials

Gamma Peptide Nucleic Acids: As Orthogonal Nucleic Acid Recognition Codes for Organizing Molecular Self-Assembly

Sacui, Iulia, Hsieh, Wei-Che, Manna, Arunava, Sahu, Bichismita, Ly, Danith H.·2015·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Nucleic acids are an attractive platform for organizing molecular self-assembly because of their specific nucleobase interactions and defined length scale. Routinely employed in the organization and assembly of materials in vitro, however, they have rarely been exploited in vivo, due to the concerns for enzymatic degradation and cross-hybridization with the host's genetic materials. Herein we report the development of a tight-binding, orthogonal, synthetically versatile, and informationally interfaced nucleic acid platform for programming molecular interactions, with implications for in vivo molecular assembly and computing. The system consists of three molecular entities: the right-handed and left-handed conformers and a nonhelical domain. The first two are orthogonal to each other in recognition, while the third is capable of binding to both, providing a means for interfacing the two conformers as well as the natural nucleic acid biopolymers (i.e., DNA and RNA). The three molecular entities are prepared from the same monomeric chemical scaffold, with the exception of the stereochemistry or lack thereof at the γ-backbone that determines if the corresponding oligo adopts a right-handed or left-handed helix, or a nonhelical motif. These conformers hybridize to each other with exquisite affinity, sequence selectivity, and level of orthogonality. Recognition modules as short as five nucleotides in length are capable of organizing molecular assembly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.5b04566

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sacui, I., Hsieh, W.-C., Manna, A., Sahu, B., & Ly, D. H.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Ly, Danith H.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2015-06-29
Volume
137
Issue
26
Pages
8603-8610
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2415738872
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CHE-1012467)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
Keywords
molecular self-assembly, nucleic acid hybridization, sequence selectivity
MeSH terms
Alanine, Circular Dichroism, DNA, Enzymes, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Phosphates, Polymers, Polystyrenes, RNA, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Stereoisomerism, Temperature, Thermodynamics, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Streptavidin, Peptide Nucleic Acids, Amino Acid Motifs, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review