The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frustrated Lewis Pairs
Abstract
The articulation of the notion of "frustrated Lewis pairs" (FLPs), which emerged from the discovery that H2 can be reversibly activated by combinations of sterically encumbered Lewis acids and bases, has prompted a great deal of recent activity. Perhaps the most remarkable consequence has been the development of FLP catalysts for the hydrogenation of a range of organic substrates. In the past 9 years, the substrate scope has evolved from bulky polar species to include a wide range of unsaturated organic molecules. In addition, effective stereoselective metal-free hydrogenation catalysts have begun to emerge. The mechanism of this activation of H2 has been explored, and the nature and range of Lewis acid/base combinations capable of effecting such activation have also expanded to include a variety of non-metal species. The reactivity of FLPs with a variety of other small molecules, including olefins, alkynes, and a range of element oxides, has also been developed. Although much of this latter chemistry has uncovered unique stoichiometric transformations, metal-free catalytic hydroamination, CO2 reduction chemistry, and applications in polymerization have also been achieved. The concept is also beginning to find applications in bioinorganic and materials chemistry as well as heterogeneous catalysis. This Perspective highlights many of these developments and discusses the relationship between FLPs and established chemistry. Some of the directions and developments that are likely to emerge from FLP chemistry in the future are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Selective Hydrogenation over Supported Metal Catalysts: From Nanoparticles to Single Atoms
Zhang, L., Zhou, M., Wang, A., & Zhang, T. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00230 · Cited by 1,611
Recent developments in and perspectives on three-coordinate boron materials: a bright future
Ji, L., Griesbeck, S., & Marder, T. B. (2017) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c6sc04245g · Cited by 733
Zhang, S., Huang, Z.-Q., Ma, Y., Gao, W., Li, J., Cao, F., Li, L., Chang, C.-R., & Qu, Y. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15266 · Cited by 508
Cui, W.-G., Zhang, G.-Y., Hu, T.-L., & Bu, X.-H. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.001 · Cited by 406
Douglas, J. J., Sevrin, M. J., & Stephenson, C. R. J. (2016) · Organic Process Research & Development · doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00125 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephan, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-08-10
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 10018-10032
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2142839187
- Cited by
- 1,178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frustrated Lewis Pairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.5b06794
- The paper
- Stephan, D. W. (2015). Frustrated Lewis Pairs. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b06794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.