The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxygen Evolution Reaction Dynamics, Faradaic Charge Efficiency, and the Active Metal Redox States of Ni–Fe Oxide Water Splitting Electrocatalysts
Abstract
Mixed Ni-Fe oxides are attractive anode catalysts for efficient water splitting in solar fuels reactors. Because of conflicting past reports, the catalytically active metal redox state of the catalyst has remained under debate. Here, we report an in operando quantitative deconvolution of the charge injected into the nanostructured Ni-Fe oxyhydroxide OER catalysts or into reaction product molecules. To achieve this, we explore the oxygen evolution reaction dynamics and the individual faradaic charge efficiencies using operando differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS). We further use X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) under OER conditions at the Ni and Fe K-edges of the electrocatalysts to evaluate oxidation states and local atomic structure motifs. DEMS and XAS data consistently reveal that up to 75% of the Ni centers increase their oxidation state from +2 to +3, while up to 25% arrive in the +4 state for the NiOOH catalyst under OER catalysis. The Fe centers consistently remain in the +3 state, regardless of potential and composition. For mixed Ni100-xFex catalysts, where x exceeds 9 atomic %, the faradaic efficiency of O2 sharply increases from ∼30% to 90%, suggesting that Ni atoms largely remain in the oxidation state +2 under catalytic conditions. To reconcile the apparent low level of oxidized Ni in mixed Ni-Fe catalysts, we hypothesize that a kinetic competition between the (i) metal oxidation process and the (ii) metal reduction step during O2 release may account for an insignificant accumulation of detectable high-valent metal states if the reaction rate of process (ii) outweighs that of (i). We conclude that a discussion of the superior catalytic OER activity of Ni-FeOOH electrocatalysts in terms of surface catalysis and redox-inactive metal sites likely represents an oversimplification that fails to capture essential aspects of the synergisms at highly active Ni-Fe sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja407115p · Cited by 7,026
Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces
Man, I. C., Su, H., Calle‐Vallejo, F., Hansen, H. A., Martínez, J. I., Inoglu, N. G., Kitchin, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Nørskov, J. K., & Rossmeisl, J. (2011) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201000397 · Cited by 4,769
Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and Earth-abundant catalysts
Luo, J., Im, J.-H., Mayer, M. T., Schreier, M., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Park, N.-G., Tilley, S. D., Fan, H. J., & Grätzel, M. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258307 · Cited by 2,509
The Mechanism of Water Oxidation: From Electrolysis via Homogeneous to Biological Catalysis
Dau, H., Limberg, C., Reier, T., Risch, M., Roggan, S., & Strasser, P. (2010) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201000126 · Cited by 1,783
Self-citationHunter, B. M., Blakemore, J. D., Deimund, M., Gray, H. B., Winkler, J. R., & Müller, A. M. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja506087h · Cited by 321
Cited by
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
Xiao, Z., Huang, Y.-C., Dong, C.-L., Xie, C., Liu, Z., Du, S., Chen, W., Yan, D., Tao, L., Shu, Z., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c00257 · Cited by 1,445
Direct Electrolytic Splitting of Seawater: Opportunities and Challenges
Dresp, S., Dionigi, F., Klingenhof, M., & Strasser, P. (2019) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00220 · Cited by 1,272
Self-citationReier, T., Nong, H. N., Teschner, D., Schlögl, R., & Strasser, P. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201601275 · Cited by 1,253
Self-citationJiang, J., Sun, F., Zhou, S., Hu, W., Zhang, H., Dong, J., Jiang, Z., Zhao, J., Li, J., Yan, W., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05341-y · Cited by 1,020
Metadata
- Authors
- Görlin, M., Chernev, P., Ferreira de Araújo, J., Reier, T., Dresp, S., Paul, B., Krähnert, R., Dau, H., & Strasser, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-04-26
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5603-5614
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2323340717
- Cited by
- 1,183
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 31.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxygen Evolution Reaction Dynamics, Faradaic Charge Efficiency, and the Active Metal Redox States of Ni–Fe Oxide Water Splitting Electrocatalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b00332
- The paper
- Görlin, M., Chernev, P., Ferreira de Araújo, J., Reier, T., Dresp, S., Paul, B., Krähnert, R., Dau, H., & Strasser, P. (2016). Oxygen Evolution Reaction Dynamics, Faradaic Charge Efficiency, and the Active Metal Redox States of Ni–Fe Oxide Water Splitting Electrocatalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b00332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.