The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transition from Superlithiophobicity to Superlithiophilicity of Garnet Solid-State Electrolyte
Abstract
All-solid-state Li-batteries using solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) offer enhanced safety over conventional Li-ion batteries with organic liquid electrolytes due to the nonflammable nature of SSEs. The superior mechanical strength of SSEs can also protect against Li dendrite penetration, which enables the use of the highest specific capacity (3861 mAh/g) and lowest redox potential (-3.04 V vs standard hydrogen electrode) anode: Li metal. However, contact between the Li metal and SSEs presents a major challenge, where a large polarization occurs at the Li metal/SSE interface. Here, the chemical properties of a promising oxide-based SSE (garnet) changed from "super-lithiophobicity" to "super-lithiophilicity" through an ultrathin coating of amorphous Si deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The wettability transition is due to the reaction between Li and Si and the in situ formation of lithiated Si. As a result, symmetric cells composed of a Si-coated garnet-structured SSE and Li metal electrodes exhibited much smaller impedance and excellent stability upon plating/stripping cycles compared to cells using bare garnet SSE. Specifically, the interfacial resistance between Li and garnet dramatically decreased from 925 to 127 Ω cm(2) when lithiated Si was formed on the garnet. Our discovery of switchable lithiophobic-lithiophilic surfaces to improve the Li metal/SSE interface opens opportunities for improving many other SSEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Cited by
Designing solid-state electrolytes for safe, energy-dense batteries
Zhao, Q., Stalin, S., Zhao, C.-Z., & Archer, L. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0165-5 · Cited by 2,372
Interfaces and Interphases in All-Solid-State Batteries with Inorganic Solid Electrolytes
Banerjee, A., Wang, X., Fang, C., Wu, E. A., & Meng, Y. S. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 · Cited by 1,526
Gao, Z., Sun, H., Fu, L., Ye, F., Zhang, Y., Luo, W., & Huang, Y. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705702 · Cited by 1,300
Self-citationPhysicochemical Concepts of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid-State Batteries
Krauskopf, T., Richter, F. H., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 · Cited by 892
An anion-immobilized composite electrolyte for dendrite-free lithium metal anodes
Zhao, C.-Z., Zhang, X.-Q., Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Xu, R., Chen, P.-Y., Peng, H.-J., Huang, J.-Q., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708489114 · Cited by 849
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, W., Gong, Y., Zhu, Y., Fu, K. K., Dai, J., Lacey, S. D., Wang, C., Liu, B., Han, X., Mo, Y., Wachsman, E. D., & Hu, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-09-08
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 12258-12262
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2517513604
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transition from Superlithiophobicity to Superlithiophilicity of Garnet Solid-State Electrolyte. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b06777
- The paper
- Luo, W., Gong, Y., Zhu, Y., Fu, K. K., Dai, J., Lacey, S. D., Wang, C., Liu, B., Han, X., Mo, Y., Wachsman, E. D., & Hu, L. (2016). Transition from Superlithiophobicity to Superlithiophilicity of Garnet Solid-State Electrolyte. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.