Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 671

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transition from Superlithiophobicity to Superlithiophilicity of Garnet Solid-State Electrolyte

Luo, Wei, Gong, Yunhui, Zhu, Yizhou, Fu, Kun Kelvin, Dai, Jiaqi, Lacey, Steven D., Wang, Chengwei, Liu, Boyang, Han, Xiaogang, Mo, Yifei, Wachsman, Eric D., Hu, Liangbing·2016·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

All-solid-state Li-batteries using solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) offer enhanced safety over conventional Li-ion batteries with organic liquid electrolytes due to the nonflammable nature of SSEs. The superior mechanical strength of SSEs can also protect against Li dendrite penetration, which enables the use of the highest specific capacity (3861 mAh/g) and lowest redox potential (-3.04 V vs standard hydrogen electrode) anode: Li metal. However, contact between the Li metal and SSEs presents a major challenge, where a large polarization occurs at the Li metal/SSE interface. Here, the chemical properties of a promising oxide-based SSE (garnet) changed from "super-lithiophobicity" to "super-lithiophilicity" through an ultrathin coating of amorphous Si deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The wettability transition is due to the reaction between Li and Si and the in situ formation of lithiated Si. As a result, symmetric cells composed of a Si-coated garnet-structured SSE and Li metal electrodes exhibited much smaller impedance and excellent stability upon plating/stripping cycles compared to cells using bare garnet SSE. Specifically, the interfacial resistance between Li and garnet dramatically decreased from 925 to 127 Ω cm(2) when lithiated Si was formed on the garnet. Our discovery of switchable lithiophobic-lithiophilic surfaces to improve the Li metal/SSE interface opens opportunities for improving many other SSEs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.6b06777

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 671

Metadata

Authors
Luo, W., Gong, Y., Zhu, Y., Fu, K. K., Dai, J., Lacey, S. D., Wang, C., Liu, B., Han, X., Mo, Y., Wachsman, E. D., & Hu, L.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2016-09-08
Volume
138
Issue
37
Pages
12258-12262
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2517513604
Cited by
671
References
1
FWCI
34.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transition from Superlithiophobicity to Superlithiophilicity of Garnet Solid-State Electrolyte. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b06777
The paper
Luo, W., Gong, Y., Zhu, Y., Fu, K. K., Dai, J., Lacey, S. D., Wang, C., Liu, B., Han, X., Mo, Y., Wachsman, E. D., & Hu, L. (2016). Transition from Superlithiophobicity to Superlithiophilicity of Garnet Solid-State Electrolyte. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06777

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.