The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring and Reporting Electrical Conductivity in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Cd2(TTFTB) as a Case Study
Abstract
Electrically conductive metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are emerging as a subclass of porous materials that can have a transformative effect on electronic and renewable energy devices. Systematic advances in these materials depend critically on the accurate and reproducible characterization of their electrical properties. This is made difficult by the numerous techniques available for electrical measurements and the dependence of metrics on device architecture and numerous external variables. These challenges, common to all types of electronic materials and devices, are especially acute for porous materials, whose high surface area make them even more susceptible to interactions with contaminants in the environment. Here, we use the anisotropic semiconducting framework Cd 2 (TTFTB) (TTFTB 4– = tetrathiafulvalene tetrabenzoate) to benchmark several common methods available for measuring electrical properties in MOFs. We show that factors such as temperature, chemical environment (atmosphere), and illumination conditions affect the quality of the data obtained from these techniques. Consistent results emerge only when these factors are strictly controlled and the morphology and anisotropy of the Cd 2 (TTFTB) single-crystal devices are taken into account. Most importantly, we show that depending on the technique, device construction, and/or the environment, a variance of 1 or even 2 orders of magnitude is not uncommon for even just one material if external factors are not controlled consistently. Differences in conductivity values of even 2 orders of magnitude should therefore be interpreted with caution, especially between different research groups comparing different compounds. These results allow us to propose a reliable protocol for collecting and reporting electrical properties of MOFs, which should help improve the consistency and comparability of reported electrical properties for this important new class of crystalline porous conductors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Cited by
Liu, R., Tan, K. T., Gong, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Xie, S., He, T., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Jiang, D. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00620c · Cited by 1,083
Nam, K. W., Park, S. S., dos Reis, R., Dravid, V. P., Kim, H., Mirkin, C. A., & Stoddart, J. F. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12857-4 · Cited by 688
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, L., Park, S. S., Sheberla, D., & Dincă, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-11-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 14772-14782
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2532881949
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring and Reporting Electrical Conductivity in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Cd2(TTFTB) as a Case Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b09345
- The paper
- Sun, L., Park, S. S., Sheberla, D., & Dincă, M. (2016). Measuring and Reporting Electrical Conductivity in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Cd2(TTFTB) as a Case Study. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b09345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.