Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 712

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tracking Catalyst Redox States and Reaction Dynamics in Ni–Fe Oxyhydroxide Oxygen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysts: The Role of Catalyst Support and Electrolyte pH

Görlin, Mikaela, Ferreira de Araújo, Jorge, Schmies, Henrike, Bernsmeier, Denis, Dresp, Sören, Gliech, Manuel, Jusys, Zenonas, Chernev, Petko, Kraehnert, Ralph, Dau, Holger, Strasser, Peter·2017·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Ni–Fe oxyhydroxides are the most active known electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline electrolytes and are therefore of great scientific and technological importance in the context of electrochemical energy conversion. Here we uncover, investigate, and discuss previously unaddressed effects of conductive supports and the electrolyte pH on the Ni–Fe(OOH) catalyst redox behavior and catalytic OER activity, combining in situ UV–vis spectro-electrochemistry, operando electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS), and in situ cryo X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Supports and pH > 13 strongly enhanced the precatalytic voltammetric charge of the Ni–Fe oxyhydroxide redox peak couple, shifted them more cathodically, and caused a 2–3-fold increase in the catalytic OER activity. Analysis of DEMS-based faradaic oxygen efficiency and electrochemical UV–vis traces consistently confirmed our voltammetric observations, evidencing both a more cathodic O 2 release and a more cathodic onset of Ni oxidation at higher pH. Using UV–vis, which can monitor the amount of oxidized Ni +3/+4 in situ, confirmed an earlier onset of the redox process at high electrolyte pH and further provided evidence of a smaller fraction of Ni +3/+4 in mixed Ni–Fe centers, confirming the unresolved paradox of a reduced metal redox activity with increasing Fe content. A nonmonotonic super-Nernstian pH dependence of the redox peaks with increasing Fe content—displaying Pourbaix slopes as steep as −120 mV/pH—suggested a two proton–one electron transfer. We explain and discuss the experimental pH effects using refined coupled (PCET) and decoupled proton transfer–electron transfer (PT/ET) schemes involving negatively charged oxygenate ligands generated at Fe centers. Together, we offer new insight into the catalytic reaction dynamics and associated catalyst redox chemistry of the most important class of alkaline OER catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.6b12250

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 712

Metadata

Authors
Görlin, M., Ferreira de Araújo, J., Schmies, H., Bernsmeier, D., Dresp, S., Gliech, M., Jusys, Z., Chernev, P., Kraehnert, R., Dau, H., & Strasser, P.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2017-01-30
Volume
139
Issue
5
Pages
2070-2082
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2576983657
Cited by
712
References
3
FWCI
18.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracking Catalyst Redox States and Reaction Dynamics in Ni–Fe Oxyhydroxide Oxygen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysts: The Role of Catalyst Support and Electrolyte pH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b12250
The paper
Görlin, M., Ferreira de Araújo, J., Schmies, H., Bernsmeier, D., Dresp, S., Gliech, M., Jusys, Z., Chernev, P., Kraehnert, R., Dau, H., & Strasser, P. (2017). Tracking Catalyst Redox States and Reaction Dynamics in Ni–Fe Oxyhydroxide Oxygen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysts: The Role of Catalyst Support and Electrolyte pH. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12250

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.