The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximizing the Photocatalytic Activity of Metal–Organic Frameworks with Aminated-Functionalized Linkers: Substoichiometric Effects in MIL-125-NH2
Abstract
Despite the promise of utilizing metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as highly tunable photocatalytic materials, systematic studies that interrogate the relationship between their catalytic performances and the amount of functionalized linkers are lacking. Aminated linkers are known to enhance the absorption of light and afford photocatalysis with MOFs under visible-light irradiation. However, the manner in which the photocatalytic performances are impacted by the amount of such linkers is poorly understood. Here, we assess the photocatalytic activity of MIL-125, a TiO 2 /1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (bdc) MOF for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde when increasing amounts of bdc-NH 2 linkers (0%, 20%, 46%, 70%, and 100%) are incorporated in the framework. Analytical TEM allowed assessing the homogeneous localization of bdc-NH 2 in these mixed-linker MOFs. Steady state reaction rates reveal two regimes of catalytic performances: a first linear regime up to ∼50% bdc-NH 2 into the hybrid framework whereby increased amounts of bdc-NH 2 yielded increased photocatalytic rates, followed by a plateau up to 100% bdc-NH 2 . This unexpected “saturation” of the catalytic activity above ∼50% bdc-NH 2 content in the framework whatever the wavelength filters used demonstrates that amination of all linkers of the MOF is not required to obtain the maximum photocatalytic activity. This is rationalized on the basis of mixed-valence Ti 3+ /Ti 4+ intermediate catalytic centers revealed by electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements and recent knowledge of lifetime excited states in MIL-125-type of solids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption/catalytic properties of MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125
Kim, S.-N., Kim, J., Kim, H.-Y., Cho, H.-Y., & Ahn, W.-S. (2013) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.014 · Cited by 528
Cited by
Photochemistry and photophysics of MOFs: steps towards MOF-based sensing enhancements
Dolgopolova, E. A., Rice, A. M., Martin, C. R., & Shustova, N. B. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00861a · Cited by 656
Modified metal-organic frameworks as photocatalysts
Qiu, J., Zhang, X., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, H., & Yao, J. (2018) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.039 · Cited by 499
Synthetic strategies, diverse structures and tuneable properties of polyoxo-titanium clusters
Fang, W.-H., Zhang, L., & Zhang, J. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00511c · Cited by 348
Wang, C.-C., Wang, X., & Liu, W. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.123601 · Cited by 258
Self-citationWang, J., Cherevan, A. S., Hannecart, C., Naghdi, S., Nandan, S. P., Gupta, T., & Eder, D. (2021) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119626 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Chambers, M. B., Wang, X., Ellezam, L., Ersen, O., Fontecave, M., Sanchez, C., Rozes, L., & Mellot-Draznieks, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-06-07
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 8222-8228
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2619581656
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.