The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimized Separation of Acetylene from Carbon Dioxide and Ethylene in a Microporous Material
Abstract
Selective separation of acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) from carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) or ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) needs specific porous materials whose pores can realize sieving effects while pore surfaces can differentiate their recognitions for these molecules of similar molecular sizes and physical properties. We report a microporous material [Zn(dps) 2 (SiF 6 )] ( UTSA-300, dps = 4,4′-dipyridylsulfide) with two-dimensional channels of about 3.3 Å, well-matched for the molecular sizes of C 2 H 2 . After activation, the network was transformed to its closed-pore phase, UTSA-300a, with dispersed 0D cavities, accompanied by conformation change of the pyridyl ligand and rotation of SiF 6 2– pillars. Strong C–H···F and π–π stacking interactions are found in closed-pore UTSA-300a, resulting in shrinkage of the structure. Interestingly, UTSA-300a takes up quite a large amounts of acetylene (76.4 cm 3 g –1 ), while showing complete C 2 H 4 and CO 2 exclusion from C 2 H 2 under ambient conditions. Neutron powder diffraction and molecular modeling studies clearly reveal that a C 2 H 2 molecule primarily binds to two hexafluorosilicate F atoms in a head-on orientation, breaking the original intranetwork hydrogen bond and subsequently expanding to open-pore structure. Crystal structures, gas sorption isotherms, molecular modeling, experimental breakthrough experiment, and selectivity calculation comprehensively demonstrated this unique metal–organic framework material for highly selective C 2 H 2 /CO 2 and C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
He, Y., Krishna, R., & Chen, B. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22858k · Cited by 674
Self-citation
Cited by
Porous metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: Status and challenges
Li, H., Li, L., Lin, R.-B., Zhou, W., Zhang, Z., Xiang, S., & Chen, B. (2019) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100006 · Cited by 891
Self-citationYang, L., Qian, S., Wang, X., Cui, X., Chen, B., & Xing, H. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00756c · Cited by 746
Self-citationOrthogonal-array dynamic molecular sieving of propylene/propane mixtures
Zeng, H., Xie, M., Wang, T., Wei, R.-J., Xie, X.-J., Zhao, Y., Lu, W., & Li, D. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03627-8 · Cited by 622
Boosting Ethane/Ethylene Separation within Isoreticular Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Frameworks
Lin, R.-B., Wu, H., Li, L., Tang, X.-L., Li, Z., Gao, J., Cui, H., Zhou, W., & Chen, B. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b07563 · Cited by 452
Self-citationYe, Y., Xian, S., Cui, H., Tan, K., Gong, L., Liang, B., Pham, T., Pandey, H., Krishna, R., Lan, P. C., et al. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c10620 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, R.-B., Li, L., Wu, H., Arman, H., Li, B., Lin, R.-G., Zhou, W., & Chen, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-06-02
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8022-8028
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2621160901
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimized Separation of Acetylene from Carbon Dioxide and Ethylene in a Microporous Material. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.7b03850
- The paper
- Lin, R.-B., Li, L., Wu, H., Arman, H., Li, B., Lin, R.-G., Zhou, W., & Chen, B. (2017). Optimized Separation of Acetylene from Carbon Dioxide and Ethylene in a Microporous Material. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b03850
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.