Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

M2(m-dobdc) (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) Metal–Organic Frameworks as Highly Selective, High-Capacity Adsorbents for Olefin/Paraffin Separations

Bachman, Jonathan E., Kapelewski, Matthew T., Reed, Douglas A., Gonzalez, Miguel I., Long, Jeffrey R.·2017·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The metal–organic frameworks M 2 ( m -dobdc) (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni; m -dobdc 4– = 4,6-dioxido-1,3-benzenedicarboxylate) were evaluated as adsorbents for separating olefins from paraffins. Using single-component and multicomponent equilibrium gas adsorption measurements, we show that the coordinatively unsaturated M 2+ sites in these materials lead to superior performance for the physisorptive separation of ethylene from ethane and propylene from propane relative to any known adsorbent, including para -functionalized structural isomers of the type M 2 ( p -dobdc) ( p -dobdc 4– = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate). Notably, the M 2 ( m -dobdc) frameworks all exhibit an increased affinity for olefins over paraffins relative to their corresponding structural isomers, with the Fe, Co, and Ni variants showing more than double the selectivity. Among these frameworks, Fe 2 ( m -dobdc) displays the highest ethylene/ethane (>25) and propylene/propane (>55) selectivity under relevant conditions, together with olefin capacities exceeding 7 mmol/g. Differential enthalpy calculations in conjunction with structural characterization of ethylene binding in Co 2 ( m -dobdc) and Co 2 ( p -dobdc) via in situ single-crystal X-ray diffraction reveal that the vast improvement in selectivity arises from enhanced metal–olefin interactions induced by increased charge density at the metal site. Moderate olefin binding enthalpies, below 55 and 70 kJ/mol for ethylene and propylene, respectively, indicate that these adsorbents maintain sufficient reversibility under mild regeneration conditions. Additionally, transient adsorption experiments show fast kinetics, with more than 90% of ethylene adsorption occurring within 30 s after dosing. Breakthrough measurements further indicate that Co 2 ( m -dobdc) can produce high purity olefins without a temperature swing, an important test of process applicability. The excellent olefin/paraffin selectivity, high olefin capacity, rapid adsorption kinetics, and low raw materials cost make the M 2 ( m -dobdc) frameworks the materials of choice for adsorptive olefin/paraffin separations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.7b06397

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Bachman, J. E., Kapelewski, M. T., Reed, D. A., Gonzalez, M. I., & Long, J. R.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2017-10-19
Volume
139
Issue
43
Pages
15363-15370
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2762912060
Cited by
236
References
9
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.