Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 997

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Refining Defect States in W18O49 by Mo Doping: A Strategy for Tuning N2 Activation towards Solar-Driven Nitrogen Fixation

Zhang, Ning, Jalil, Abdul, Wu, Daoxiong, Chen, Shuangming, Liu, Yifei, Gao, Chao, Ye, Wei, Qi, Zeming, Ju, Huanxin, Wang, Chengming, Wu, Xiaojun, Song, Li, Zhu, Junfa, Xiong, Yujie·2018·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Photocatalysis may provide an intriguing approach to nitrogen fixation, which relies on the transfer of photoexcited electrons to the ultrastable N≡N bond. Upon N 2 chemisorption at active sites (e.g., surface defects), the N 2 molecules have yet to receive energetic electrons toward efficient activation and dissociation, often forming a bottleneck. Herein, we report that the bottleneck can be well tackled by refining the defect states in photocatalysts via doping. As a proof of concept, W 18 O 49 ultrathin nanowires are employed as a model material for subtle Mo doping, in which the coordinatively unsaturated (CUS) metal atoms with oxygen defects serve as the sites for N 2 chemisorption and electron transfer. The doped low-valence Mo species play multiple roles in facilitating N 2 activation and dissociation by refining the defect states of W 18 O 49: (1) polarizing the chemisorbed N 2 molecules and facilitating the electron transfer from CUS sites to N 2 adsorbates, which enables the N≡N bond to be more feasible for dissociation through proton coupling; (2) elevating defect-band center toward the Fermi level, which preserves the energy of photoexcited electrons for N 2 reduction. As a result, the 1 mol % Mo-doped W 18 O 49 sample achieves an ammonia production rate of 195.5 μmol g cat –1 h –1, 7-fold higher than that of pristine W 18 O 49 . In pure water, the catalyst demonstrates an apparent quantum efficiency of 0.33% at 400 nm and a solar-to-ammonia efficiency of 0.028% under simulated AM 1.5 G light irradiation. This work provides fresh insights into the design of photocatalyst lattice for N 2 fixation and reaffirms the versatility of subtle electronic structure modulation in tuning catalytic activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b02076

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 997

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, N., Jalil, A., Wu, D., Chen, S., Liu, Y., Gao, C., Ye, W., Qi, Z., Ju, H., Wang, C., Wu, X., Song, L., Zhu, J., & Xiong, Y.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2018-07-05
Volume
140
Issue
30
Pages
9434-9443
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2854019328
Cited by
997
References
8
FWCI
23.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.