Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuning Lewis Acidity of Metal–Organic Frameworks via Perfluorination of Bridging Ligands: Spectroscopic, Theoretical, and Catalytic Studies

Ji, Pengfei, Drake, Tasha, Murakami, Akiko, Oliveres, Pau, Skone, Jonathan H., Lin, Wenbin·2018·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The Lewis acidity of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) has attracted much research interest in recent years. We report here the development of two quantitative methods for determining the Lewis acidity of MOFs—based on electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of MOF-bound superoxide (O 2 •– ) and fluorescence spectroscopy of MOF-bound N -methylacridone (NMA)—and a simple strategy that significantly enhances MOF Lewis acidity through ligand perfluorination. Two new perfluorinated MOFs, Zr 6 -fBDC and Zr 6 -fBPDC, where H 2 fBDC is 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid and H 2 fBPDC is 2,2′,3,3′,5,5′,6,6′-octafluoro-4,4′-biphenyldicarboxylic acid, were shown to be significantly more Lewis acidic than nonsubstituted UiO-66 and UiO-67 as well as the nitrated MOFs Zr 6 -BDC-NO 2 and Zr 6 -BPDC-(NO 2 ) 2 . Zr 6 -fBDC was shown to be a highly active single-site solid Lewis acid catalyst for Diels–Alder and arene C–H iodination reactions. Thus, this work establishes the important role of ligand perfluorination in enhancing MOF Lewis acidity and the potential of designing highly Lewis acidic MOFs for fine chemical synthesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b05765

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Ji, P., Drake, T., Murakami, A., Oliveres, P., Skone, J. H., & Lin, W.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2018-07-26
Volume
140
Issue
33
Pages
10553-10561
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2884989811
Cited by
193
References
1
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.