The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tuning Lewis Acidity of Metal–Organic Frameworks via Perfluorination of Bridging Ligands: Spectroscopic, Theoretical, and Catalytic Studies
Abstract
The Lewis acidity of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) has attracted much research interest in recent years. We report here the development of two quantitative methods for determining the Lewis acidity of MOFs—based on electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of MOF-bound superoxide (O 2 •– ) and fluorescence spectroscopy of MOF-bound N -methylacridone (NMA)—and a simple strategy that significantly enhances MOF Lewis acidity through ligand perfluorination. Two new perfluorinated MOFs, Zr 6 -fBDC and Zr 6 -fBPDC, where H 2 fBDC is 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid and H 2 fBPDC is 2,2′,3,3′,5,5′,6,6′-octafluoro-4,4′-biphenyldicarboxylic acid, were shown to be significantly more Lewis acidic than nonsubstituted UiO-66 and UiO-67 as well as the nitrated MOFs Zr 6 -BDC-NO 2 and Zr 6 -BPDC-(NO 2 ) 2 . Zr 6 -fBDC was shown to be a highly active single-site solid Lewis acid catalyst for Diels–Alder and arene C–H iodination reactions. Thus, this work establishes the important role of ligand perfluorination in enhancing MOF Lewis acidity and the potential of designing highly Lewis acidic MOFs for fine chemical synthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Cited by
Defect Chemistry in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Recognition, Understanding, and Utilization
Xie, C., Yan, D., Li, H., Du, S., Chen, W., Wang, Y., Zou, Y., Chen, R., & Wang, S. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c03034 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Ji, P., Drake, T., Murakami, A., Oliveres, P., Skone, J. H., & Lin, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-07-26
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 10553-10561
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2884989811
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.