Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accumulation of Glassy Poly(ethylene oxide) Anchored in a Covalent Organic Framework as a Solid-State Li+ Electrolyte

Zhang, Gen, Hong, You-lee, Nishiyama, Yusuke, Bai, Songyan, Kitagawa, Susumu, Horike, Satoshi·2019·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Design of molecular structures showing fast ion conductive/transport pathways in the solid state has been a significant challenge. The amorphous or glassy phase in organic polymers works well for fast ion conductivity because of their dynamic and random structure. However, the main issue with these polymers has been the difficulty in elucidating the mechanisms of ion conduction and thus low designability. Furthermore, the amorphous or glassy state of ion conductive polymers often confronts the problems of structural/mechanical stabilities. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are an emerging class of crystalline organic polymers with periodic structure and tunable functionality, which exhibit potential as a unique ion conductor/transporter. Here, we describe the use of a COF as a medium for all-solid-state Li + conductivity. A bottom-up self-assembly approach was applied to covalently reticulate the flexible, bulky, and glassy poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) moieties that can solvate Li + for fast transport by their segmental motion in the rigid two-dimensional COF architectures. Temperature-dependent powder X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analysis showed that the periodic structures are intact even above 300 °C, and differential scanning calorimetry and solid-state NMR revealed that the accumulated PEO chains are highly dynamic and exhibit a glassy state. Li + conductivity was found to depend on the dynamics and length of PEO chains in the crystalline states, and solid-state Li + conductivity of 1.33 × 10 –3 S cm –1 was achieved at 200 °C after LiTFSI doping. The high conductivity at the specified temperature remains intact for extended periods of time as a result of the structure’s robustness. Furthermore, we demonstrated the first application of a COF electrolyte in an all-solid-state Li battery at 100 °C.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b07670

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, G., Hong, Y.-L., Nishiyama, Y., Bai, S., Kitagawa, S., & Horike, S.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2018-12-21
Volume
141
Issue
3
Pages
1227-1234
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2905801883
Cited by
352
References
1
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.