The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PdSeO3 Monolayer: Promising Inorganic 2D Photocatalyst for Direct Overall Water Splitting Without Using Sacrificial Reagents and Cocatalysts
Abstract
Direct production of H 2 from photocatalytic water splitting is a potential solution to environmental pollution and energy crisis, and tremendous efforts have been made to seek efficient photocatalysts that can split pure water (pH = 7) under visible light irradiation. Herein, by means of systematic density functional theory (DFT) computations, we demonstrated that the two-dimensional (2D) PdSeO 3 monolayer is a promising candidate. The mechanical exfoliation of PdSeO 3 monolayer from its bulk phase is experimentally feasible due to the rather small cleavage energy of ∼0.42 J/m 2 . Remarkably, PdSeO 3 monolayer is semiconducting with a moderate indirect band gap of 2.84 eV, and its valence and conduction bands perfectly engulf the redox potentials of water. In particular, water oxidation and hydrogen reduction half reactions can both occur readily on the different active sites of PdSeO 3 monolayer under the potentials solely provided by photogenerated electrons and holes. As PdSeO 3 monolayer also has rather pronounced optical absorption in the visible and ultraviolet regions of the solar spectrum, it could be utilized as a highly efficient photocatalyst for splitting pure water into H 2 and O 2 in a stoichiometric amount of 2:1 without using sacrificial reagents or cocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode
Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp047349j · Cited by 13,153
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis
Yang, J., Wang, D., Han, H., & Li, C. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300227e · Cited by 2,848
Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
Maeda, K., & Domen, K. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz1007966 · Cited by 2,739
Progress, challenge and perspective of heterogeneous photocatalysts
Qu, Y., & Duan, X. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35355e · Cited by 1,466
Cited by
Wan, Y., Wang, L., Xu, H., Wu, X., & Yang, J. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c00564 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiao, M., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Chen, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-08-31
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 12256-12262
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2888776392
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.