The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chiral BINOL-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks for Enantioselective Sensing
Abstract
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have emerged as a novel platform for material design and functional explorations, but it remains a challenge to synthetically functionalize targeted structures for task-specific applications. Optically pure 1,1'-bi-2-naphthol (BINOL) is one of the most important sources of chirality for organic synthesis and materials science, but it has not yet been used in construction of COFs for enantioselective processes. Here, by elaborately designing and choosing an enantiopure BINOL-based linear dialdehyde and a tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene derivative or tetrakis(4-aminophenyl)ethene as building blocks, two imine-linked chiral fluorescent COFs with a 2D layered hexagonal or tetragonal structure are prepared. The COF containing flexible tetraphenylethylene units can be readily exfoliated into ultrathin 2D nanosheets and electrospun to make free-standing nanofiber membrane. In both the solution and membrane systems, the fluorescence of COF nanosheets can be effectively quenched by chiral odor vapors via supramolecular interactions with the immobilized BINOL moieties, leading to remarkable chiral vapor sensors. Compared to the BINOL-based homogeneous and membrane systems, the COF nanosheets exhibited greatly enhanced sensitivity and enantioselectivity owing to the confinement effect and the conformational rigidity of the sensing BINOL groups in the framework. The ability to place such a useful BINOL chiral auxiliary inside open channels of COFs capable of amplifying chiral discrimination of the analytes represents a major step toward the rational synthesis of porous molecular materials for more chirality applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ordered porous materials for emerging applications
Davis, M. E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00785 · Cited by 5,308
Cited by
Covalent Organic Framework Photocatalysts: Structures and Applications
Wang, H., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Tang, L., Zeng, G., Xu, P., Chen, M., Xiong, T., Zhou, C., Li, X., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00278j · Cited by 1,301
Chiral Metal–Organic Frameworks
Gong, W., Chen, Z., Dong, J., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00740 · Cited by 579
Self-citationChiral covalent organic frameworks: design, synthesis and property
Han, X., Yuan, C., Hou, B., Liu, L., Li, H., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00009d · Cited by 478
Self-citationCovalent Organic Polymers and Frameworks for Fluorescence-Based Sensors
Skorjanc, T., Shetty, D., & Valant, M. (2021) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.1c00183 · Cited by 420
Peluso, P., & Chankvetadze, B. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00846 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, X., Han, X., Xu, Q., Liu, Y., Yuan, C., Yang, S., Liu, Y., Jiang, J., & Cui, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-04-11
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 7081-7089
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2937525844
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.