The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microporous 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks for Liquid Chromatographic Separation of Xylene Isomers and Ethylbenzene
Abstract
Microporous covalent organic frameworks (COFs) hold great potential for small molecule separation but are yet challenging to design and synthesize. Here we report a framework interpenetration strategy to make microporous COFs for efficient separations of C 8 alkyl-aromatic isomers. Two pairs of microporous three-dimensional (3D) salen- and Zn(salen)-based COFs are prepared by Schiff-base condensation of ethanediamine with tetrahedral tetra(salicylaldehyde)-silane or -methane derivatives in the presence or absence of metal ions. The four 3D COFs are isostructural and have a 7-fold interpenetrated diamondoid open framework with less than 8.0 Å wide tubular channels. They exhibit permanent porosity, high thermal stability, and good chemical resistance. The two COFs functionalized with uncoordinated salen groups can serve as stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography to provide baseline separation of xylene isomers and ethylbenzene with excellent column efficiency and precision, whereas the COFs with Zn(salen) motifs cannot achieve high-resolution separation. The salen-COFs showed high affinity to the o -xylene, allowing fast and selective separation of the o -isomer from the other isomers within 7 min. This is the first report utilizing COFs to separate the practically important aromatic isomers. This work highlights new opportunities in designing microporous COFs and paves the way to expand the potential applications of COF materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seven chemical separations to change the world
Sholl, D. S., & Lively, R. P. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/532435a · Cited by 4,769
He, Y., Krishna, R., & Chen, B. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22858k · Cited by 674
Cited by
Liu, R., Tan, K. T., Gong, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Xie, S., He, T., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Jiang, D. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00620c · Cited by 1,083
Dong, J., Han, X., Liu, Y., Li, H., & Cui, Y. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202004796 · Cited by 561
Self-citationChiral covalent organic frameworks: design, synthesis and property
Han, X., Yuan, C., Hou, B., Liu, L., Li, H., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00009d · Cited by 478
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J., Han, X., Yang, S., Cao, Y., Yuan, C., Liu, Y., Wang, J., & Cui, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-05-15
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8996-9003
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2946582456
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.