Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 902

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building Up a Picture of the Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction Activity of Transition Metal Single-Atom Catalysts

Liu, Xin, Jiao, Yan, Zheng, Yao, Jaroniec, Mietek, Qiao, Shi-Zhang·2019·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The lack of chemical understanding and efficient catalysts impedes the development of electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction (eNRR) for ammonia production. In this work, we employed density functional theory calculations to build up a picture (activity trends, electronic origins, and design strategies) of single-atom catalysts (SACs) supported on nitrogen-doped carbons as eNRR electrocatalysts. To construct such a picture, this work presents systematic studies of the eNRR activity of SACs covering 20 different transition metal (TM) centers coordinated by nitrogen atoms contained in three types of nitrogen-doped carbon substrates, which gives 60 SACs. Our study shows that the intrinsic activity trends could be established on the basis of the nitrogen adatom adsorption energy (Δ E N* ). Furthermore, the influence of metal and support (ligands) on Δ E N* proved to be related to the bonding/antibonding orbital population and regulating the scaling relations for adsorption of intermediates, respectively. Accordingly, a two-step strategy is proposed for improving the eNNR activity of TM-SACs, which involves the following: (i) selection of the most promising family of SACs (g-C 3 N 4 supported SACs as predicted in this work) and (ii) further improvement of the activity of the best candidate in the aforementioned family via tuning the adsorption strength of the key intermediates. Also, the stability of N-doped carbon supports and their selectivity in comparison to the competing hydrogen evolution need to be taken into consideration for screening the durable and efficient candidates. Finally, an effective strategy for designing active, stable, and selective SACs based on the mechanistic insights is elaborated to guide future eNRR studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b03811

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 902

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S.-Z.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2019-05-30
Volume
141
Issue
24
Pages
9664-9672
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2947517642
Cited by
902
References
8
FWCI
24.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building Up a Picture of the Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction Activity of Transition Metal Single-Atom Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b03811
The paper
Liu, X., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2019). Building Up a Picture of the Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction Activity of Transition Metal Single-Atom Catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b03811

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.