The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climbing the Apex of the ORR Volcano Plot via Binuclear Site Construction: Electronic and Geometric Engineering
Abstract
Great enthusiasm in single-atom catalysts (SACs) for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has been aroused by the discovery of M–N X as a promising ORR catalysis center. However, the performance of SACs lags far behind that of state-of-the-art Pt due to the unsatisfactory adsorption–desorption behaviors of the reported catalytic centers. To address this issue, rational manipulation of the active site configuration toward a well-managed energy level and geometric structure is urgently desired, yet still remains a challenge. Herein, we report a novel strategy to accomplish this task through the construction of an Fe–Co dual-atom centered site. A spontaneously absorbed electron-withdrawing OH ligand was proposed to act proactively as an energy level modifier to empower easy intermediate desorption, while the triangular Fe–Co–OH coordination facilitates O–O bond scission. Benefiting from these attributes, the as-constructed FeCoN 5 –OH site enables an ORR onset potential and half-wave potential of up to 1.02 and 0.86 V (vs RHE), respectively, with an intrinsic activity over 20 times higher than the single-atom FeN 4 site. Our finding not only opens up a novel strategy to tailor the electronic structure of an atomic site toward boosted activity but also provides new insights into the fundamental understanding of diatomic sites for ORR electrocatalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode
Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp047349j · Cited by 13,153
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Cited by
Liu, L., & Corma, A. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00733 · Cited by 689
Cui, T., Wang, Y., Ye, T., Wu, J., Chen, Z., Li, J., Lei, Y., Wang, D., & Li, Y. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202115219 · Cited by 659
Chen, Y., Gao, R., Ji, S., Li, H., Tang, K., Jiang, P., Hu, H., Zhang, Z., Hao, H., Qu, Q., et al. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202012798 · Cited by 650
Self-citationEmerging Dual‐Atomic‐Site Catalysts for Efficient Energy Catalysis
Zhang, W., Chao, Y., Zhang, W., Zhou, J., Lv, F., Wang, K., Lin, F., Luo, H., Li, J., Tong, M., et al. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202102576 · Cited by 528
Liu, M., Li, N., Cao, S., Wang, X., Lu, X., Kong, L., Xu, Y., & Bu, X. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202107421 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, M., Chen, Y., Zhu, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, X., Gao, L., Wang, X., Zhao, J., Ge, J., Jiang, Z., Chen, S., Liu, C., & Xing, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-10-11
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 17763-17770
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2979917947
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climbing the Apex of the ORR Volcano Plot via Binuclear Site Construction: Electronic and Geometric Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b08362
- The paper
- Xiao, M., Chen, Y., Zhu, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, X., Gao, L., Wang, X., Zhao, J., Ge, J., Jiang, Z., Chen, S., Liu, C., & Xing, W. (2019). Climbing the Apex of the ORR Volcano Plot via Binuclear Site Construction: Electronic and Geometric Engineering. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b08362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.