Cited by 303Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Carbon-Defect-Driven Electroless Deposition of Pt Atomic Clusters for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution

Cheng, Qingqing, Hu, Chuangang, Wang, Guoliang, Zou, Zhiqing, Yang, Hui, Dai, Liming·2020·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Pt atomic clusters (Pt-ACs) display outstanding electrocatalytic performance because of their unique electronic structure with a large number of highly exposed surface atoms. However, the small size and large specific surface area intrinsically associated with ACs pose challenges in the synthesis and stabilization of Pt-ACs without agglomeration. Herein, we report a novel one-step carbon-defect-driven electroless deposition method to produce ultrasmall but well-defined and stable Pt-ACs supported by defective graphene (Pt-AC/DG) structures. A theoretical simulation clearly revealed that the defective regions with a lower work function and hence a higher reducing capacity compared to those of normal hexagonal sites triggered the reduction of Pt ions preferentially at the defect sites. Moreover, the strong binding energy between Pt and carbon defects effectively restricted the migration of spontaneously reduced Pt atoms to immobilize/stabilize the resultant Pt-ACs. Electrochemical analyses demonstrated the high performance of Pt-ACs in catalyzing the hydrogen evolution reaction, showing a greatly enhanced mass activity, a high Pt utilization efficiency, and excellent stability compared with commercial Pt/C catalysts. The integration of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis with Pt-AC/DG as a cathode exhibited an excellent hydrogen generation activity and extraordinary stability (during 200 h of electrolysis) with a greatly reduced Pt usage compared with commercial Pt/C ca…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b11524

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, Q., Hu, C., Wang, G., Zou, Z., Yang, H., & Dai, L.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Hui
  • Dai, Liming
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2020-02-23
Volume
142
Issue
12
Pages
5594-5601
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3007042320
Cited by
303
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 17
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2017YFA0206500, 2018YFB1502400)
  • Australian Research Council (DP 190103881, FL 190100126)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21533005, 21902177)
  • Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy (XDA21090400)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
electroless plating, carbon defects, defective graphene, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, Pt/C catalyst, proton exchange membrane water electrolysis, catalyst stability, work function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review