The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revealing Principles for Design of Lean-Electrolyte Lithium Metal Anode via In Situ Spectroscopy
Abstract
Lean-electrolyte conditions are highly pursued for practical lithium (Li) metal batteries. The previous studies on the Li metal anodes, in general, exhibited good stability with a large excess of electrolyte. However, the targeted design of Li hosts under relatively low electrolyte conditions has been rarely studied so far. Herein, we have shown that electrolyte consumption severely affects the cycling stability of Li metal anode. Considering carbon hosts as typical examples, we innovatively employed in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction, in situ Raman spectroscopy, and theoretical computations to obtain a better understanding of the Li nucleation/deposition processes. We also showed the usefulness of in situ electrochemical impedance spectra to analyze interfacial fluctuation at the Li/electrolyte interface, together with nuclear magnetic resonance data to quantify electrolyte consumption. We have found that uneven Li nucleation/deposition and the crack of surface-area-derived solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) layer both lead to a great consumption of electrolyte. Then, we suggested a design principle for Li host to overcome the electrolyte loss, that is, uneven growth of the Li structure and the crack of the SEI layer must be simultaneously controlled. As a proof of concept, we demonstrated the usefulness of a 3D low-surface-area defective graphene host (L-DG) to control Li nucleation/deposition and stabilize the SEI layer, contributing to a highly reversible Li plating/stripping. As a result, such a Li host can achieve stable cycles (e.g., 1.0 mAh cm –2 ) with a low electrolyte loading (10 μL). This work demonstrates the necessity to design Li metal anodes under lean-electrolyte conditions and brings Li metal batteries a step closer to their practical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Cited by
Electrochemical energy storage devices working in extreme conditions
Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Xing, G., Chou, S.-L., & Tang, Y. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00271f · Cited by 346
Self-citationZhang, W., Lu, J., & Guo, Z. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.015 · Cited by 336
Liquid metal batteries for future energy storage
Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Fan, Q., Zhang, C., Zhou, T., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., & Guo, Z. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00531f · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., Chao, D., Chen, B., Chen, X., Chuah, C., Tang, Y., Jiao, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S.-Z.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-01-03
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2012-2022
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2997127498
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revealing Principles for Design of Lean-Electrolyte Lithium Metal Anode via In Situ Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b11774
- The paper
- Li, H., Chao, D., Chen, B., Chen, X., Chuah, C., Tang, Y., Jiao, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2020). Revealing Principles for Design of Lean-Electrolyte Lithium Metal Anode via In Situ Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b11774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.