Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,151

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tackling the Activity and Selectivity Challenges of Electrocatalysts toward the Nitrogen Reduction Reaction via Atomically Dispersed Biatom Catalysts

Guo, Xiangyu, Gu, Jinxing, Lin, Shiru, Zhang, Shengli, Chen, Zhongfang, Huang, Shiping·2020·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Developing efficient catalysts for nitrogen fixation is becoming increasingly important but is still challenging due to the lack of robust design criteria for tackling the activity and selectivity problems, especially for electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR). Herein, by means of large-scale density functional theory (DFT) computations, we reported a descriptor-based design principle to explore the large composition space of two-dimensional (2D) biatom catalysts (BACs), namely, metal dimers supported on 2D expanded phthalocyanine (M 2 -Pc or MM′-Pc), toward the NRR at the acid conditions. We sampled both homonuclear (M 2 -Pc) and heteronuclear (MM′-Pc) BACs and constructed the activity map of BACs by using N 2 H* adsorption energy as the activity descriptor, which reduces the number of promising catalyst candidates from over 900 to less than 100. This strategy allowed us to readily identify 3 homonuclear and 28 heteronuclear BACs, which could break the metal-based activity benchmark toward the efficient NRR. Particularly, using the free energy difference of H* and N 2 H* as a selectivity descriptor, we screened out five systems, including Ti 2 -Pc, V 2 -Pc, TiV-Pc, VCr-Pc, and VTa-Pc, which exhibit a strong capability of suppressing the competitive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with favorable limiting potential of −0.75, −0.39, −0.74, −0.85, and −0.47 V, respectively. This work not only broadens the possibility of discovering more efficient BACs toward N 2 fixation but also provides a feasible strategy for rational design of NRR electrocatalysts and helps pave the way to fast screening and design of efficient BACs for the NRR and other electrochemical reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b13349

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 1,151

Metadata

Authors
Guo, X., Gu, J., Lin, S., Zhang, S., Chen, Z., & Huang, S.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
142
Issue
12
Pages
5709-5721
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3007099140
Cited by
1,151
References
6
FWCI
31.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tackling the Activity and Selectivity Challenges of Electrocatalysts toward the Nitrogen Reduction Reaction via Atomically Dispersed Biatom Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b13349
The paper
Guo, X., Gu, J., Lin, S., Zhang, S., Chen, Z., & Huang, S. (2020). Tackling the Activity and Selectivity Challenges of Electrocatalysts toward the Nitrogen Reduction Reaction via Atomically Dispersed Biatom Catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.