Cited by 33Thermodynamic properties of mixturesDiffusion Coefficients in LiquidsChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions

Viscosity of Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions at High Temperatures and High Pressures. Viscosity B-coefficient. Sodium Iodide

Abdulagatov, Ilmutdin M., Zeinalova, Adelya B., Azizov, Nazim D.·2006·Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Abstract

The viscosity of seven (0.062, 0.166, 0.456, 0.552, 1.754, 3.062, and 4.700) mol·kg -1 binary aqueous NaI solutions has been measured with a capillary-flow technique. Measurements were performed at pressures up to 30 MPa. The range of temperature was from (298 to 575) K. The total uncertainty of viscosity, pressure, temperature, and composition measurements was estimated to be less than 1.6 %, 0.05 %, 15 mK, and 0.015 %, respectively. The effect of temperature, pressure, and concentration on viscosity of binary aqueous NaI solutions was studied. The measured values of the viscosity of NaI(aq) were compared with data, predictions, and correlations reported in the literature. The viscosity data have been analyzed and interpreted in terms of the extended Jones−Dole equation for the relative viscosity (η/η 0 ) of strong electrolyte solutions to accurately calculate the values of the viscosity A - and B -coefficients as a function of temperature. The derived values of the viscosity A - and B -coefficients were compared with the values calculated from the Falkenhagen−Dole theory and ionic B -coefficient data, respectively. The physical meaning parameters V and E in the Eyring's absolute rate theory of viscosity, the hydrodynamic molar volume V k (effective rigid molar volume of salt) in the extended Einstein relation for the relative viscosity, and the Arrhenius−Andrade parameters A and b = E a / R (where E a is the flow activation energy) were calculated using the present experimental viscosity data. The effective pressures P e due to the salt (NaI) in water were calculated from the present viscosity measurements by using the TTG model. The predictive capability of the various models for viscosity electrolyte solutions has been tested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/je060124c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdulagatov, I. M., Zeinalova, A. B., & Azizov, N. D.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Geothermal Problems of the Dagestan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 367003 Makhachkala, Shamilya Str. 39-A, Dagestan, RussiaAzerbaijan State Oil Academy, Baku, 370601, Azerbaijan
  • Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University (AZ)
Venue
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Published
2006-07-21
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
1645-1659
ISSN
  • 0021-9568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5134
OpenAlex
W2047984721
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Thermodynamic properties of mixtures
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Diffusion Coefficients in Liquids
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Keywords
sodium iodide, aqueous electrolyte solutions, viscosity, viscosity B-coefficients, high pressure, high temperature, Jones-Dole equation, flow activation energy, effective pressure, viscosity correlation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review