Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interfacial Tension between CO2, Freshwater, and Brine in the Range of Pressure from (2 to 27) MPa, Temperature from (20 to 125) °C, and Water Salinity from (0 to 334 000) mg·L−1

Bachu, Stefan, Bennion, D. Brant·2009·Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Abstract

An extensive laboratory program was conducted for the measurement of the interfacial tension between CO 2 and water or brine covering the ranges of (2 to 27) MPa pressure, (20 to 125) °C temperature, and (0 to 334 010) mg·L −1 water salinity. The laboratory experiments were conducted using the pendant drop method combined with the solution of the Laplace equation for capillarity for the profile of the brine drop in the CO 2 −brine equilibrium environment. The analysis of the resulting set of 378 IFT measurements reveals that: (1) under conditions of constant temperature and water salinity, IFT steeply decreases with increasing pressure in the range P < P c and mildly decreases for P > P c with an asymptotic trend toward a constant value at higher pressures; (2) under the same conditions of constant pressure and temperature, IFT increases with increasing water salinity, reflecting decreasing CO 2 solubility in brine as salinity increases; (3) the dependence of IFT on temperature is more complex than that on either pressure or salinity, depending on the CO 2 phase. For T < T c, IFT increases with increasing temperature, and around the critical point ( T ≈ T c ), IFT significantly decreases (believed to be associated with the fact that at T c the IFT between CO 2 liquid and vapor phases tends to zero) and then increases again with increasing temperature for T > T c with an asymptotic trend toward a constant value for high temperatures. The dependence of IFT on pressure, temperature, and water salinity for CO 2 and water/brine systems can be well approximated by a power function of pressure whose coefficient and exponent depend on temperature and water salinity. These results indicate that, in the case of CO 2 storage in deep saline aquifers as a climate-change mitigation strategy, the formation water displacement by injected CO 2 during the injection (drainage) phase of CO 2 storage and the possible subsequent CO 2 displacement by invading brine during the CO 2 migration (imbibition) phase depend on in situ conditions of pressure, temperature, and water salinity through the effects that these primary variables have on the IFT between CO 2 and aquifer brine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/je800529x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Bachu, S., & Bennion, D. B.
Venue
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Published
2008-12-31
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
765-775
ISSN
  • 0021-9568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5134
OpenAlex
W2084961434
Cited by
344
References
19
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interfacial Tension between CO2, Freshwater, and Brine in the Range of Pressure from (2 to 27) MPa, Temperature from (20 to 125) °C, and Water Salinity from (0 to 334 000) mg·L−1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/je800529x
The paper
Bachu, S., & Bennion, D. B. (2009). Interfacial Tension between CO2, Freshwater, and Brine in the Range of Pressure from (2 to 27) MPa, Temperature from (20 to 125) °C, and Water Salinity from (0 to 334 000) mg·L−1. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je800529x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.