Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identification of the Astringent Taste Compounds in Black Tea Infusions by Combining Instrumental Analysis and Human Bioresponse

Scharbert, Susanne, Holzmann, Nadine, Hofmann, Thomas·2004·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Application of taste dilution analyses on freshly prepared black tea infusions revealed neither the high molecular weight thearubigen-like polyphenols nor the catechins and theaflavins, but a series of 14 flavon-3-ol glycosides as the main contributors to the astringent taste perceived upon black tea consumption. Among these glycosides, the apigenin-8-C-[alpha-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1-->2)-O-beta-d-glucopyranoside] was identified for the first time in tea infusions. Depending on the structure, the flavon-3-ol glycosides were found to induce a velvety and mouth-coating sensation at very low threshold concentrations, which were far below those of catechins or theaflavins; for example, the threshold of 0.001 micromol/L found for quercetin-3-O-[alpha-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1-->6)-O-beta-d-glucopyranoside] is 190000, or 16000 times below the threshold determined for epigallocatechin gallate or theaflavin, respectively. Moreover, structure/activity considerations revealed that, besides the type of flavon-3-ol aglycon, the type and the sequence of the individual monosaccharides in the glycosidic chain are key drivers for astringency perception of flavon-3-ol glycosides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf049802u

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Scharbert, S., Holzmann, N., & Hofmann, T.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2004-05-05
Volume
52
Issue
11
Pages
3498-3508
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W1983251185
Cited by
485
References
0
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.