Antifungal Activity of Strawberry Fruit Volatile Compounds against Colletotrichum acutatum
Abstract
Eight volatile products characterizing strawberry aroma, which is generated from the oxidative degradation of linoleic and linolenic acids by a lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway, were examined because of their antifungal activity against Colletotrichum acutatum, one of the causal agents of strawberry anthracnose. In this study, the effects of aldehydes, alcohols, and esters on mycelial growth and conidia development were evaluated. (E)-Hex-2-enal was found to be the best inhibitor of mycelial growth [MID (minimum inhibitory doses)=33.65 microL L(-1)] and of spore germination (MID=6.76 microL L(-1)), while hexyl acetate was the least effective of all volatile compounds tested (MID=6441.89 microL L(-1) for mycelial growth and MID=1351.35 microL L(-1) for spore germination). Furthermore, the antifungal activity of (E)-hex-2-enal on susceptibility of strawberry fruits to C. acutatum was also confirmed. The presence of these molecules in jars containing strawberry fruits inoculated with a suspension of spores inhibited the fungus growth and prevented the appearance of symptoms. Moreover, a study of the effects of (E)-hex-2-enal on conidial cells of C. acutatum was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy. This volatile compound altered the structures of the cell wall and plasma membrane, causing disorganization and lysis of organelles and, eventually, cell death.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strawberry fruit volatile compounds are effective against anthracnose of strawberry.
“| Strawberry ( Fragaria spp.) | Fruit | Volatile compounds | Anthracnose of strawberry | [34] |”
From Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management (2012) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management
Gurjar, M. S., Ali, S., Akhtar, M., & Singh, K. S. (2012) · Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.4236/as.2012.33050 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Comparing impacts of plant extracts and pure allelochemicals and implications for pest control.
Opender Koul, O. K., & Suresh Walia, S. W. (2009) · CABI Reviews · doi:10.1079/pavsnnr20094049 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arroyo, F. T., Moreno, J., Daza, P., Boianova, L., & Romero, F.
- Affiliations
- Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-06-13
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5701-5707
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2059245920
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Keywords
- antifungal activity, Colletotrichum acutatum, strawberry anthracnose, lipoxygenase pathway, linoleic acid oxidation, mycelial growth inhibition, conidial germination
- MeSH terms
- Fruit, Fungicides, Industrial, Hexobarbital, Volatilization, Colletotrichum, Fragaria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review