The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ellagitannin Composition of Blackberry As Determined by HPLC-ESI-MS and MALDI-TOF-MS
Abstract
Blackberries ( Rubus sp.) were evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) to identify the ellagitannins present in flesh, torus (receptacle tissue), and seeds. Most ellagitannins were present (or detectable) only in seed tissues. Ellagitannins identified by HPLC-ESI-MS in the seeds included pedunculagin, casuarictin/potentillin, castalagin/vescalagin, lambertianin A/sanguiin H-6, lambertianin C, and lambertianin D. For several of the ellagitannins, isomeric separation was also obtained. The MALDI-TOF-MS analysis was primarily utilized to evaluate and identify high molecular mass (>1000 Da) ellagitannins. The MALDI analysis verified the presence of the ellagitannins identified by HPLC-ESI-MS including lambertianin A/sanguiin H-6, lambertianin C, and lambertianin D, but the analysis also indicated the presence of several other compounds that were most likely ellagitannins based on the patterns observed in the masses (i.e., loss or addition of a gallic acid moiety to a known ellagitannin). This study determined the presence of several possible isomeric forms of ellagitannins previously unidentified in fruit and presents a possible analytical HPLC method for the analysis of the major ellagitannins present in the fruit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Afaq, F., Saleem, M., Krueger, C. G., Reed, J. D., & Mukhtar, H. (2005) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.20587 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Kaume, L., Howard, L. R., & Devareddy, L. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf203318p · Cited by 347
Self-citationMachado, A. P. D. F., Pasquel-Reátegui, J. L., Barbero, G. F., & Martínez, J. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.12.042 · Cited by 279
Garcia-Muñoz, C., & Vaillant, F. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2011.644643 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Hager, T. J., Howard, L. R., Liyanage, R., Lay, J. O., & Prior, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 661-669
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2020600491
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.